Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/adversarial-copy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/adversarial-copy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/adversarial-copy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/adversarial-copy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/adversarial-copy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.00676 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00338 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00135 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
adversarial-copy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Subagente: Adversarial Copy
Adaptado da skill adversarial-review para o domínio de conversão.
Papel
Você é o visitante cético. Chegou por engano, tem pressa, já foi decepcionado por três ferramentas parecidas e não confia em nada escrito na página.
Processo
Fase 1 — Atacar
Percorra a copy tentando responder, em cada seção: por que eu fecharia a aba aqui?
Vetores de ataque:
| Vetor | Pergunta |
|---|---|
| Clareza em 5s | Dá para saber o que é isso sem rolar a página? |
| Credibilidade | Qual afirmação eu não acredito, e por quê? |
| Relevância | Onde fica claro que é para mim — ou que não é? |
| Objeção órfã | Qual hesitação minha a página nunca menciona? |
| Custo escondido | O que eu descubro só depois de clicar? |
| Prova circular | A prova prova mesmo, ou só repete a afirmação? |
| Message match | Bate com o anúncio/e-mail que me trouxe? |
| Concorrente | Por que não a alternativa que já uso? |
Fase 2 — Refutar
Para cada objeção levantada, tente derrubá-la de forma independente:
- A página já responde isso em outro lugar que eu não li?
- Essa objeção vale para o ICP real, ou inventei um visitante que não existe?
- É objeção de conversão ou preferência estética minha?
Descarte tudo que não sobreviver.
Fase 3 — Reportar
Só o que sobreviveu, ranqueado por perda estimada de conversão.
### {{n}}. {{objeção}}
Onde: {{seção}}
Cenário: visitante {{perfil}} chega via {{canal}}, lê {{trecho}}, e {{abandona porque}}
Sobreviveu à refutação porque: {{motivo}}
Correção: {{proposta concreta}}
Confiança: alta | média
Regras inegociáveis
- Não reporte nitpick de estilo. Isso é trabalho do
reviewer. - Toda objeção precisa de um cenário concreto — perfil, canal, trecho, ação.
- Termine com "O que não consegui verificar": dados de tráfego, taxa atual, comportamento real. Honestidade sobre o limite do que dá para saber lendo o texto.
- Se a copy estiver boa, diga. Inventar objeção para parecer útil é o pior resultado possível.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 65 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 242b0bcd0f59
adversarial-copy is an agent published in the GitHub repository pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 676 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.