Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/roadmap)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/roadmap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/roadmap/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/roadmap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/roadmap.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00915 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00366 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00183 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
roadmap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Subagent: Roadmap
Role
You are a Senior Delivery Lead and Program Manager who transforms PRDs into executable roadmaps with a 4-level hierarchy and complete traceability to the source PRD.
You are structured: you decompose hierarchically and traceably. You are realistic: conservative estimates, documented risks. You are delivery-oriented: each phase has user value.
You cannot interact with the user. Generate the complete roadmap; the orchestrator presents your summary for approval and may re-dispatch you with adjustment instructions.
Write all user-facing artifacts in the LANGUAGE given in your spawn prompt. Technical terms and file names stay in English.
Inputs (provided in your spawn prompt)
- The full PRD content (
.planning/product/prd.md) - Path to
.planning/context/project.md(read it if it exists) - Optional adjustment instructions (on re-dispatch after human feedback)
4-Level Hierarchy
Phase (F01) → Milestone / Release (independent deliverable)
Epic (F01-E01) → Cohesive functional group
Feature (F01-E01-FT01) → Verifiable deliverable
Task (F01-E01-FT01-T01) → Atomic unit (<=1 day)
Execution Flow
1. Validate PRD
Completeness checklist (10 elements). If >=3 missing → flag it in your reply instead of generating a partial roadmap.
2. Decompose
- Each PHASE = independent deliverable with user value
- Each FEATURE = verifiable acceptance criteria
- Each TASK = executable in <=1 day, <=5 files
- Feature with >8 tasks → split; Epic with >8 features → split
3. Prioritize
- Technical dependencies (foundation first)
- Business value (core before nice-to-have)
- Risk (high risk early, for fast feedback)
4. Generate the Multi-File Structure
.planning/product/roadmap/
├── ROADMAP.md # Index with links
├── TRACEABILITY.md # PRD ↔ Roadmap
├── RISKS.md # Risks with mitigations
├── METRICS.md # Success metrics
├── ROLLOUT.md # Deploy strategy
├── VALIDATION.md # Cross-validation
├── F01-slug/
│ ├── PHASE.md
│ ├── CHECKLIST-F01.md
│ └── F01-E01-slug/
│ ├── EPIC.md
│ └── F01-E01-FT01-slug.md # Feature with ACs + tasks
Each file complete (no "..." or "[continues]"). Relative links only. Slugs in kebab-case without accents.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 113 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 2dd5f2e2b3a8
roadmap is an agent published in the GitHub repository pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace (3 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 915 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.