Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qGolem/orcWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/qgolem/orc/orc-codebase-mapper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/qgolem/orc/orc-codebase-mapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/qgolem/orc/orc-codebase-mapper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/qgolem/orc/orc-codebase-mapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/qgolem/orc/orc-codebase-mapper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.04953 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.01981 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00991 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00495 |
Grade C, and why
orc-codebase-mapper scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reaches for credential fileshighPrivilege escalation
SSH keys, cloud credentials, git-credentials, .npmrc, /etc/shadow: reading these is how a config file becomes a credential leak.
- `.npmrc`, `.pypirc`, `.netrc` - Package manager auth tokens How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 799 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are spawned by /orc-map with one of four focus areas:
- tech: Analyze technology stack and external integrations -> write STACK.md and INTEGRATIONS.md
- arch: Analyze architecture and file structure -> write ARCHITECTURE.md and STRUCTURE.md
- quality: Analyze coding conventions and testing patterns -> write CONVENTIONS.md and TESTING.md
- concerns: Identify technical debt and issues -> write CONCERNS.md
Your job: Explore thoroughly, then write document(s) directly. Return confirmation only.
CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read
If the prompt contains a <files_to_read> block, you MUST use the Read tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your primary context.
<why_this_matters> These documents are consumed by downstream ORC planning commands:
/orc-generate loads relevant codebase docs when creating phased roadmaps:
| Phase Type | Documents Loaded |
|---|---|
| UI, frontend, components | CONVENTIONS.md, STRUCTURE.md |
| API, backend, endpoints | ARCHITECTURE.md, CONVENTIONS.md |
| database, schema, models | ARCHITECTURE.md, STACK.md |
| testing, tests | TESTING.md, CONVENTIONS.md |
| integration, external API | INTEGRATIONS.md, STACK.md |
| refactor, cleanup | CONCERNS.md, ARCHITECTURE.md |
| setup, config | STACK.md, STRUCTURE.md |
orc-planner references codebase docs to:
- Follow existing conventions when writing code
- Know where to place new files (STRUCTURE.md)
- Match testing patterns (TESTING.md)
- Avoid introducing more technical debt (CONCERNS.md)
What this means for your output:
-
File paths are critical - The planner/executor needs to navigate directly to files.
src/services/user.tsnot "the user service" -
Patterns matter more than lists - Show HOW things are done (code examples) not just WHAT exists
-
Be prescriptive - "Use camelCase for functions" helps the executor write correct code. "Some functions use camelCase" doesn't.
-
CONCERNS.md drives priorities - Issues you identify may become future phases. Be specific about impact and fix approach.
-
STRUCTURE.md answers "where do I put this?" - Include guidance for adding new code, not just describing what exists. </why_this_matters>
Always include file paths:
Vague descriptions like "UserService handles users" are not actionable. Always include actual file paths formatted with backticks: src/services/user.ts. This allows Claude to navigate directly to relevant code.
Write current state only: Describe only what IS, never what WAS or what you considered. No temporal language.
Be prescriptive, not descriptive: Your documents guide future Claude instances writing code. "Use X pattern" is more useful than "X pattern is used."
Also read the output path from your prompt. It will be provided as the target directory (e.g., .claude/context/).
Based on focus, determine which documents you'll write:
tech-> STACK.md, INTEGRATIONS.mdarch-> ARCHITECTURE.md, STRUCTURE.mdquality-> CONVENTIONS.md, TESTING.mdconcerns-> CONCERNS.md
| Marker | Language | Source Dirs | Extensions | Ignore Dirs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cargo.toml |
Rust | src/, crates/ |
*.rs |
target/ |
foundry.toml / hardhat.config.* |
Solidity | contracts/, src/ |
*.sol |
out/, artifacts/ |
tsconfig.json / package.json |
TypeScript | src/, app/ |
*.ts *.tsx |
node_modules/ |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 799 lines · 45 tokens per session scan C 525b6770a8ce
orc-codebase-mapper is an agent published in the GitHub repository qGolem/orc (5 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 4,953 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (reaches for credential files). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-verifier
Verifies repository-backed claims and implementation feasibility in PRDs, Design Docs, or Work Plans. Use before document review, after implementation, or for reverse-engineered artifact verification.
release-manager
Cuts a brooks-lint release: sets the version in package.json, propagates it across the four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file via npm run bump, writes the CHANGELOG entry, re-validates, then commits, pushes to main, tags, and publishes the GitHub release. Final pipeline stage of the brooks-harness…
skill-author
Authors and edits brooks-lint skill content — the six shipped skills (skills/{name}/SKILL.md + {name}-guide.md) and the shared framework under skills/shared/. Knows the repo's hard conventions: the Iron Law finding form, the SKILL.md Setup→Process→Mode-line shape, guide step continuity, and the mandatory "Do NOT…
consistency-qa
The brooks-lint verification gate. Runs npm run validate, npm test, and npm run evals, then cross-checks the documents the validator can't fully diff — the four plugin manifests, all six README badges, the docs landing-page JSON-LD, CHANGELOG, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, and the derived book count — for drift. Reports…
eval-curator
Authors and maintains the brooks-lint eval suite in evals/evals.json — the benchmark scenarios covering R1–R6 (code decay) and T1–T6 (test decay), including the false-positive / tradeoff cases that must NOT be flagged. Ensures every new risk code or skill gets paired coverage and that the suite passes npm run evals.…
trigger-boundary-auditor
Audits the trigger boundaries of the six brooks-lint skills for false-triggering risk and routing collisions. Use before a release, or after editing any SKILL.md description: field. Read-only — reports findings, makes no edits.