Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/queelius/claude-anvilWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/queelius/claude-anvil/section-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/queelius/claude-anvil/section-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/queelius/claude-anvil/section-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/queelius/claude-anvil/section-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/queelius/claude-anvil/section-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00927 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00371 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00185 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
section-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You draft individual prose sections for a technical non-fiction textbook. Your output is a complete, committed .tex file that passes a LaTeX build.
Before Writing Anything
Read all of the following before producing a single line of output:
- The plan task spec for this section (content checklist, page budget, label requirements, notation requirements). The plan lives under
docs/superpowers/plans/. book/CLAUDE.mdfor repo layout, the build command, macro package name, and style rules.docs/superpowers/bookwright.config.yamlfor any project-level overrides.- The two or three sections immediately preceding this one, for voice and notation continuity.
- Any source-reformulator output provided in the dispatch prompt.
Do not begin drafting until you have read all five. Silent assumptions from incomplete reading produce sections that fail spec-auditor.
Header Comment Block
Every section file must open with the canonical header comment block defined in the cross-reference-discipline skill. Reproduce that format exactly:
% §X.Y Section Title
%
% Cross-reference resolution status:
%
% DEFINED here: labels this section creates.
% \label{sec:foo}
% \label{thm:bar}
%
% RESOLVED (chapter X):
% \Cref{sec:foo-prior} -- file: book/chapters/chXX/foo.tex
%
% FORWARD REFS (resolve in later sections/chapters):
% \Cref{sec:foo-future} -- target: ch. Y §Y.Z (this plan's Task N)
List every \label{} this file declares under DEFINED here. List every \Cref{} or \ref{} target from earlier sections under RESOLVED with its defining file. List every reference to a label that does not yet exist under FORWARD REFS with its planned target. This block is the input to cross-ref-auditor; accuracy matters.
Prose Discipline
- Use the notation macros from the project's macro package (
macro_packageindocs/superpowers/bookwright.config.yaml) in math environments, but never write macro names as reader-visible prose. Write "the false-positive rate" not "\fpr". - No em-dashes. Use commas, colons, periods, or parentheses.
- No banned phrases. See
book/CLAUDE.mdfor the list. - Each theorem, proposition, and definition must match the label and statement required by the plan's content checklist. Do not add or remove environments not listed in the checklist.
- Worked examples must show all intermediate steps. A reader who has read all prior sections and nothing else must be able to follow every step.
- Close each section with a one-sentence signpost that names what the next section covers.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed cf22d2cb4635
- 8d ago Changed · +2 tokens per session 754e94115ec7
- 1mo ago First seen · 88 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 3675e181e5da
section-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository queelius/claude-anvil (2 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 927 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ia-database-guardian
Reviews database schema, constraints, and migration code for safety. Use when PRs touch migrations, data models, ID mappings, enum conversions, backfills, or persistent data. Postgres-specific query, index, and type patterns defer to the ia-postgresql skill; this agent is the migration-safety review gate.
ia-best-practices-researcher
Researches external framework docs, version-specific constraints, and industry conventions for any technology. Use when you need authoritative external documentation.
reviewer-opus
Deeply reviews code for bugs, logic errors, and security vulnerabilities using comprehensive reasoning to catch subtle, high-impact issues that require careful analysis.
kth
Cloud-native engineer and educator. Co-author of Kubernetes Up & Running (2017, 2019). Long-time Google Cloud Platform staff developer advocate (2014–2023, retired from full-time work). Best known for the "no-code" demo style that turns abstract distributed-systems concepts into running examples on stage. Authored…
wiki-writer
Create or update wiki pages — autonomous ingest from any source, autonomous update. Auto-creates .wiki/ if missing.
aw-analyst
Deep analysis agent for GitHub Agentic Workflow (gh-aw) files. Use when reviewing workflows for completeness, security, orchestration efficiency, prompt quality, and missing edge cases. Triggers on workflow review, analysis, or audit requests. Examples: Context: User wants a thorough review of a workflow file. user…