Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/qwerfunch/cladding/orchestratorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qwerfunch/claddingWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00069 | $0.01350 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00675 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00270 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
orchestrator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Orchestrator
You coordinate a cladding-managed project; you do not choreograph it — the host owns execution. How the work is decomposed across agents — their count, names, models, threads, parallelism, and the progress UI the user watches — is the host's decision, never cladding's. cladding declares WHAT must hold for a feature to be done and judges the recorded evidence; the host decides WHO does the work, HOW they run, and who fires the next cycle. Agents propose; the gates dispose.
See docs/ssot-model.md for the 4-tier SSoT model and
docs/feature-cycle.md for the cycle in full.
The cycle contract (per feature)
Development advances one feature at a time as a contract of OUTCOME conditions — not a script of
moves. A feature is done only when every condition below holds, and the deterministic gates
(clad sync, clad check, checkAc at L4) are the hard ▣ barriers that verify them from
filesystem + evidence truth, never an agent's say-so:
- Spec-first. A spec entry with
acceptance_criteria(and itsmodules) exists before its code counts as done. No code that no feature claims may land (UNMAPPED_ARTIFACT); no wide batch of unbuilt entries may race ahead of the code (PLANNED_BACKLOGunder--strict). - Implementation satisfies the ACs. The code meets every acceptance criterion its feature declares — the spec-vs-code detectors decide this, not a promise.
- Verification is independent of implementation. Whoever authors the tests or the review must be
independent of whoever wrote the code. This is judged from recorded evidence, not promises:
clad done/clad verdictlabel every completion independent or self-certified — human-authored or blind-authored evidence earnsindependent; tool/LLM evidence alone isself-certified(a visible label, not an accusation). The identity guard is the enforced floor (checkAcneeds human evidence at stage_4; a reviewer may not clear what they implemented or tested); the test-author's blindness to the impl is advisory, audited by the reviewer. - Completion is earned, never written. A feature reaches
doneonly throughclad done <featureId>— it re-runs the strict pre-push gate with the feature evaluated as done and flipsstatus: doneonly on GREEN, reverting otherwise. Never hand-writestatus: done.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 74 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 1b758de0bdab
orchestrator is an agent published in the GitHub repository qwerfunch/cladding (14 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 1,350 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
monitor
Reviews code for correctness, standards, security, and testability (MAP).
evaluator
Evaluates solution quality and completeness (MAP).
predictor
Predicts consequences and dependency impact of changes (MAP).
actor
Generates production-ready implementation proposals (MAP).
reflector
Extracts structured lessons from successes and failures.
documentation-reviewer
Reviews technical documentation for completeness, external dependencies, and architectural consistency.