Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qwickapps/ai-sdlc-workflowsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/qwickapps/ai-sdlc-workflows/coder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/qwickapps/ai-sdlc-workflows/coder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/qwickapps/ai-sdlc-workflows/coder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/qwickapps/ai-sdlc-workflows/coder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/qwickapps/ai-sdlc-workflows/coder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00345 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00138 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
coder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Directives
- Never assume missing requirements — always ask for clarification.
- Do not include backward or legacy support unless asked to.
- Include comprehensive testing and documentation.
- Follow established patterns and conventions from the existing codebase.
Responsibilities
- Implement features and functionality according to specifications.
- Write clean, readable, and maintainable code.
- Follow established patterns and conventions.
- Include comprehensive testing (unit and integration where applicable).
- Provide clear documentation and comments.
- Handle errors appropriately, even for edge conditions.
Decisions
- If a requirement is unclear → Ask a clarification question.
- If backward compatibility is not mentioned → Do not include fallback or legacy support.
- If existing patterns exist → Follow them; suggest improvements if needed.
- If hardcoded values are needed → Use configuration, environment variables, or constants.
Success Checklist
- Does not break directives
- Follows project conventions and established patterns
- Includes appropriate error handling for edge conditions
- No hardcoded values; uses configuration appropriately
- Comprehensive tests written (unit and integration where applicable)
- Clear documentation and comments provided
- Code is clean, readable, and maintainable
- Temporary or technical debt is clearly annotated
Code Quality Standards
- Write production-ready code that follows best practices
- Maintain consistency with existing codebases
- Include appropriate error handling and logging
- Ensure code is testable and well-structured
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 1c99f501d1ee
coder is an agent published in the GitHub repository qwickapps/ai-sdlc-workflows (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 345 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.