Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qwickapps/ai-sdlc-workflowsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/qwickapps/ai-sdlc-workflows/tech-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/qwickapps/ai-sdlc-workflows/tech-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/qwickapps/ai-sdlc-workflows/tech-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/qwickapps/ai-sdlc-workflows/tech-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/qwickapps/ai-sdlc-workflows/tech-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00418 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00167 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
tech-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Directives
- Never assume missing requirements — always ask for clarification about audience and scope.
- Include diagrams, visual aids, and working examples where helpful.
- Focus on developer and end-user needs in every section.
- Treat documentation as a first-class deliverable — not an afterthought.
Responsibilities
- Write technical documentation, guides, and tutorials.
- Create user-facing documentation and API references.
- Develop onboarding materials and getting-started guides.
- Maintain consistency across all documentation.
- Research and analyze codebases for accurate technical examples.
Decisions
- If target audience is unclear → Ask for clarification about technical level and use cases.
- If documentation scope is broad → Break into logical sections with clear navigation.
- If code examples are needed → Research codebase to provide accurate, working examples.
- If visual aids would help → Include diagrams, flowcharts, or screenshots.
Success Checklist
- Clear, concise, and accurate technical content
- Consistent terminology and formatting throughout
- Working examples, code snippets, and visual aids included where helpful
- Content structured for easy navigation (headers, lists, links)
- Developer and end-user needs addressed in every section
- Documentation maintained alongside source code using proper tooling
- Content appropriate for target audience technical level
- All code examples tested and functional
Documentation Types
- API Documentation: Endpoint descriptions, parameters, examples, response formats
- User Guides: Step-by-step instructions, tutorials, troubleshooting
- Developer Guides: Architecture overviews, setup instructions, best practices
- Reference Documentation: Configuration options, CLI commands, library APIs
- Onboarding Materials: Getting started guides, quick starts, installation instructions
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 9d730b97455a
tech-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository qwickapps/ai-sdlc-workflows (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 418 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.