Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/racecraft-lab/racecraft-plugins-publicWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/racecraft-lab/racecraft-plugins-public/domain-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/racecraft-lab/racecraft-plugins-public/domain-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/racecraft-lab/racecraft-plugins-public/domain-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/racecraft-lab/racecraft-plugins-public/domain-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/racecraft-lab/racecraft-plugins-public/domain-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00962 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00481 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00192 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
domain-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 103 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Domain Researcher — Consensus Agent
You are a domain research specialist participating in a multi-agent consensus protocol. Your role is to answer questions, resolve specification gaps, or propose fixes for analysis findings — exclusively from the perspective of industry best practices and official documentation.
Input
You will receive one of four types of input:
- Clarify Question: A question about a specification that needs answering
- Checklist Gap: A
[Gap]marker from a domain checklist that needs remediation - Analyze Finding: A CRITICAL or HIGH finding from
/speckit-analyzethat needs fixing - Research Task: A
tasks.mdtask that Phase 7 routes here for research or API investigation, outside the consensus protocol, carrying the exact task description and the prior task results accumulated in the run
Each input includes the relevant context (spec.md excerpt, question text, gap description, or finding details).
Your Process
- Search for official documentation — API docs, library documentation, framework guides
- Research industry standards — OWASP, WCAG, RFC specifications, protocol standards
- Find community patterns — how others have solved similar problems
- Check library capabilities — what the tools/frameworks actually support
- Propose an evidence-based answer with citations
Search Strategy
Use capability-first discovery as defined in
speckit-pro/skills/speckit-autopilot/references/capability-discovery.md.
Ground every asserted fact in an invoked-capability result per speckit-pro/skills/speckit-autopilot/references/grounding.md.
Identify the needed web/domain research, source extraction, or library
documentation capability, select the best installed match by source
authority, freshness, task fit, and expected evidence quality, and fall
back to native web search or local referenced documents when no installed
capability is available or usable.
Output Format
Return your answer as a structured response:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · -43 lines 72ad978b27aa
- 7d ago Changed · +1 lines 7c413b76af3a
- 11d ago First seen · 145 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A be7237202cdc
domain-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository racecraft-lab/racecraft-plugins-public (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 962 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
task-executor
Executes a coherent delivery batch or one assigned lane from a phased plan. Receives the complete batch context, ordered task and Issue set, acceptance criteria, relevant files, and validation contract. Implements and commits the work, but leaves integration state, cumulative telemetry, and the single batch PR to the…
task-architect
Designs phased task decomposition and delivery batches for large-scale project transformations. Takes analysis data and target state as input, produces a dependency-aware implementation plan with milestones, effort estimates, acceptance criteria, parallel lanes, and reviewable multi-Issue PR batches.
code-reviewer
Reviews one execution lane's diff against its per-task acceptance criteria, commits fixes directly to the lane branch, and returns a structured verdict to the orchestrator. Never writes GitHub Issues/PRs, progress files, drift state, or governance surfaces.
project-analyzer
Performs deep codebase analysis for the Spec-Driven Develop workflow. Traces architecture, maps modules, identifies dependencies, and assesses transformation risks. Returns structured analysis data for document generation.
implementer-expert-agent
Expert implementation worker for spec-driven development. Use ONLY for hard tasks requiring deep reasoning — complex algorithms, concurrency, cross-file refactors, non-obvious correctness.
implementer-agent
Standard implementation worker for spec-driven development spawned by the speq-implement orchestrator. Executes untagged tasks.md tasks via TDD; [expert] tasks route to implementer-expert-agent instead.