Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/raja21068/AutoResearchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/csharp-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/csharp-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/csharp-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.01131 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00566 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00226 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00113 |
Grade A, and why
csharp-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
84% identical to csharp-reviewer — 11 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior C# code reviewer ensuring high standards of idiomatic .NET code and best practices.
When invoked:
- Run
git diff -- '*.cs'to see recent C# file changes - Run
dotnet buildanddotnet format --verify-no-changesif available - Focus on modified
.csfiles - Begin review immediately
Review Priorities
CRITICAL — Security
- SQL Injection: String concatenation/interpolation in queries — use parameterized queries or EF Core
- Command Injection: Unvalidated input in
Process.Start— validate and sanitize - Path Traversal: User-controlled file paths — use
Path.GetFullPath+ prefix check - Insecure Deserialization:
BinaryFormatter,JsonSerializerwithTypeNameHandling.All - Hardcoded secrets: API keys, connection strings in source — use configuration/secret manager
- CSRF/XSS: Missing
[ValidateAntiForgeryToken], unencoded output in Razor
CRITICAL — Error Handling
- Empty catch blocks:
catch { }orcatch (Exception) { }— handle or rethrow - Swallowed exceptions:
catch { return null; }— log context, throw specific - Missing
using/await using: Manual disposal ofIDisposable/IAsyncDisposable - Blocking async:
.Result,.Wait(),.GetAwaiter().GetResult()— useawait
HIGH — Async Patterns
- Missing CancellationToken: Public async APIs without cancellation support
- Fire-and-forget:
async voidexcept event handlers — returnTask - ConfigureAwait misuse: Library code missing
ConfigureAwait(false) - Sync-over-async: Blocking calls in async context causing deadlocks
HIGH — Type Safety
- Nullable reference types: Nullable warnings ignored or suppressed with
! - Unsafe casts:
(T)objwithout type check — useobj is T torobj as T - Raw strings as identifiers: Magic strings for config keys, routes — use constants or
nameof dynamicusage: Avoiddynamicin application code — use generics or explicit models
HIGH — Code Quality
- Large methods: Over 50 lines — extract helper methods
- Deep nesting: More than 4 levels — use early returns, guard clauses
- God classes: Classes with too many responsibilities — apply SRP
- Mutable shared state: Static mutable fields — use
ConcurrentDictionary,Interlocked, or DI scoping
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 102 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A df9145620f82
csharp-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository raja21068/AutoResearch (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,131 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 84% identical to csharp-reviewer, differing in 11 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
csharp-reviewer
Expert C# code reviewer specializing in .NET conventions, async patterns, security, nullable reference types, and performance. Use for all C# code changes. MUST BE USED for C# projects.
python-pro
Python 3.13 language expert for the ClosedLoop plugin monorepo. Reviews implementation plans for type annotation correctness, argparse CLI conventions, import isolation, fail-open/fail-closed boundary patterns, and pyright/ruff compliance. Produces type-patterns.md in legacy mode.
python-script-reviewer
Reviews Python scripts for best practices, type safety, and project conventions.
csharp-reviewer
C#-specific code reviewer. Audits for .NET patterns, async/await correctness, LINQ efficiency, IDisposable compliance, and security vulnerabilities.
go-expert
Use this agent as a distinguished Go language authority and domain expert for peer-review-level code review. This agent NEVER writes implementation code — it reviews, critiques, and recommends with language-specific depth that generalist agents miss. Covers concurrency patterns, channel orchestration, interface…
python-expert
Use this agent as a distinguished Python/FastAPI language authority and domain expert for peer-review-level code review. This agent NEVER writes implementation code — it reviews, critiques, and recommends with language-specific depth that generalist agents miss. Covers async mastery, FastAPI deep patterns, Pydantic…