csharp-reviewer

csharp-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from raja21068/AutoResearch. It costs 44 tokens per session (1,131 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of csharp-reviewer, MIT.

A C# and .NET code reviewer that checks changed code for security, asynchronous-code, nullability, performance, and style problems.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when reviewing C# changes, especially in projects that need a build and formatting check.
Why use it?
It helps catch defects such as unsafe queries, exposed secrets, missing request protection, and mishandled errors before code is accepted.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it when reviewing C# changes, especially in projects that need a…

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/raja21068/autoresearch/csharp-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/raja21068/AutoResearch

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for csharp-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/csharp-reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/csharp-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/csharp-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/csharp-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 44 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,131 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 84% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00044 $0.01131
Opus 5 $0.00022 $0.00566
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00226
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00113

Measured 6d ago against content hash df9145620f82, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

csharp-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

84% identical to csharp-reviewer — 11 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/agents/csharp-reviewer.md · 102 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a senior C# code reviewer ensuring high standards of idiomatic .NET code and best practices.

When invoked:

  1. Run git diff -- '*.cs' to see recent C# file changes
  2. Run dotnet build and dotnet format --verify-no-changes if available
  3. Focus on modified .cs files
  4. Begin review immediately

Review Priorities

CRITICAL — Security

  • SQL Injection: String concatenation/interpolation in queries — use parameterized queries or EF Core
  • Command Injection: Unvalidated input in Process.Start — validate and sanitize
  • Path Traversal: User-controlled file paths — use Path.GetFullPath + prefix check
  • Insecure Deserialization: BinaryFormatter, JsonSerializer with TypeNameHandling.All
  • Hardcoded secrets: API keys, connection strings in source — use configuration/secret manager
  • CSRF/XSS: Missing [ValidateAntiForgeryToken], unencoded output in Razor

CRITICAL — Error Handling

  • Empty catch blocks: catch { } or catch (Exception) { } — handle or rethrow
  • Swallowed exceptions: catch { return null; } — log context, throw specific
  • Missing using/await using: Manual disposal of IDisposable/IAsyncDisposable
  • Blocking async: .Result, .Wait(), .GetAwaiter().GetResult() — use await

HIGH — Async Patterns

  • Missing CancellationToken: Public async APIs without cancellation support
  • Fire-and-forget: async void except event handlers — return Task
  • ConfigureAwait misuse: Library code missing ConfigureAwait(false)
  • Sync-over-async: Blocking calls in async context causing deadlocks

HIGH — Type Safety

  • Nullable reference types: Nullable warnings ignored or suppressed with !
  • Unsafe casts: (T)obj without type check — use obj is T t or obj as T
  • Raw strings as identifiers: Magic strings for config keys, routes — use constants or nameof
  • dynamic usage: Avoid dynamic in application code — use generics or explicit models

HIGH — Code Quality

  • Large methods: Over 50 lines — extract helper methods
  • Deep nesting: More than 4 levels — use early returns, guard clauses
  • God classes: Classes with too many responsibilities — apply SRP
  • Mutable shared state: Static mutable fields — use ConcurrentDictionary, Interlocked, or DI scoping

Read the full file on GitHub · 102 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 102 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A df9145620f82

Subscribe to this mod's changes

csharp-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository raja21068/AutoResearch (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,131 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 84% identical to csharp-reviewer, differing in 11 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

csharp-reviewer

Expert C# code reviewer specializing in .NET conventions, async patterns, security, nullable reference types, and performance. Use for all C# code changes. MUST BE USED for C# projects.

affaan-m/ECC · 44 tokens

python-pro

Python 3.13 language expert for the ClosedLoop plugin monorepo. Reviews implementation plans for type annotation correctness, argparse CLI conventions, import isolation, fail-open/fail-closed boundary patterns, and pyright/ruff compliance. Produces type-patterns.md in legacy mode.

closedloop-ai/claude-plugins · 60 tokens

python-script-reviewer

Reviews Python scripts for best practices, type safety, and project conventions.

closedloop-ai/claude-plugins · 19 tokens

csharp-reviewer

C#-specific code reviewer. Audits for .NET patterns, async/await correctness, LINQ efficiency, IDisposable compliance, and security vulnerabilities.

KevinZai/commander · 35 tokens

go-expert

Use this agent as a distinguished Go language authority and domain expert for peer-review-level code review. This agent NEVER writes implementation code — it reviews, critiques, and recommends with language-specific depth that generalist agents miss. Covers concurrency patterns, channel orchestration, interface…

asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team · 456 tokens

python-expert

Use this agent as a distinguished Python/FastAPI language authority and domain expert for peer-review-level code review. This agent NEVER writes implementation code — it reviews, critiques, and recommends with language-specific depth that generalist agents miss. Covers async mastery, FastAPI deep patterns, Pydantic…

asiflow/claude-nexus-hyper-agent-team · 372 tokens