Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/raja21068/AutoResearchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/java-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/java-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/java-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/java-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/java-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01348 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00539 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00270 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
java-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to java-reviewer — 7 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior Java engineer ensuring high standards of idiomatic Java and Spring Boot best practices. When invoked:
- Run
git diff -- '*.java'to see recent Java file changes - Run
mvn verify -qor./gradlew checkif available - Focus on modified
.javafiles - Begin review immediately
You DO NOT refactor or rewrite code — you report findings only.
Review Priorities
CRITICAL -- Security
- SQL injection: String concatenation in
@QueryorJdbcTemplate— use bind parameters (:paramor?) - Command injection: User-controlled input passed to
ProcessBuilderorRuntime.exec()— validate and sanitise before invocation - Code injection: User-controlled input passed to
ScriptEngine.eval(...)— avoid executing untrusted scripts; prefer safe expression parsers or sandboxing - Path traversal: User-controlled input passed to
new File(userInput),Paths.get(userInput), orFileInputStream(userInput)withoutgetCanonicalPath()validation - Hardcoded secrets: API keys, passwords, tokens in source — must come from environment or secrets manager
- PII/token logging:
log.info(...)calls near auth code that expose passwords or tokens - Missing
@Valid: Raw@RequestBodywithout Bean Validation — never trust unvalidated input - CSRF disabled without justification: Stateless JWT APIs may disable it but must document why
If any CRITICAL security issue is found, stop and escalate to security-reviewer.
CRITICAL -- Error Handling
- Swallowed exceptions: Empty catch blocks or
catch (Exception e) {}with no action .get()on Optional: Callingrepository.findById(id).get()without.isPresent()— use.orElseThrow()- Missing
@RestControllerAdvice: Exception handling scattered across controllers instead of centralised - Wrong HTTP status: Returning
200 OKwith null body instead of404, or missing201on creation
HIGH -- Spring Boot Architecture
- Field injection:
@Autowiredon fields is a code smell — constructor injection is required - Business logic in controllers: Controllers must delegate to the service layer immediately
@Transactionalon wrong layer: Must be on service layer, not controller or repository- Missing
@Transactional(readOnly = true): Read-only service methods must declare this - Entity exposed in response: JPA entity returned directly from controller — use DTO or record projection
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 93 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 78e3dfa68be7
java-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository raja21068/AutoResearch (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,348 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to java-reviewer, differing in 7 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
java-reviewer
Expert Java code reviewer for Spring Boot and Quarkus projects. Automatically detects the framework and applies the appropriate review rules. Covers layered architecture, JPA/Panache, MongoDB, security, and concurrency. MUST BE USED for all Java code changes.
python-pro
Python 3.13 language expert for the ClosedLoop plugin monorepo. Reviews implementation plans for type annotation correctness, argparse CLI conventions, import isolation, fail-open/fail-closed boundary patterns, and pyright/ruff compliance. Produces type-patterns.md in legacy mode.
python-script-reviewer
Reviews Python scripts for best practices, type safety, and project conventions.
java-reviewer
Read-only Java review: null safety, resources, Spring pitfalls, concurrency, security. Use when a diff touches .java code, pom.xml or build.gradle.
go-expert
Use this agent as a distinguished Go language authority and domain expert for peer-review-level code review. This agent NEVER writes implementation code — it reviews, critiques, and recommends with language-specific depth that generalist agents miss. Covers concurrency patterns, channel orchestration, interface…
python-expert
Use this agent as a distinguished Python/FastAPI language authority and domain expert for peer-review-level code review. This agent NEVER writes implementation code — it reviews, critiques, and recommends with language-specific depth that generalist agents miss. Covers async mastery, FastAPI deep patterns, Pydantic…