Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/raja21068/AutoResearchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/pr-test-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/pr-test-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/pr-test-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/pr-test-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/pr-test-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00210 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00084 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00042 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
pr-test-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to pr-test-analyzer — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
PR Test Analyzer Agent
You review whether a PR's tests actually cover the changed behavior.
Analysis Process
1. Identify Changed Code
- map changed functions, classes, and modules
- locate corresponding tests
- identify new untested code paths
2. Behavioral Coverage
- check that each feature has tests
- verify edge cases and error paths
- ensure important integrations are covered
3. Test Quality
- prefer meaningful assertions over no-throw checks
- flag flaky patterns
- check isolation and clarity of test names
4. Coverage Gaps
Rate gaps by impact:
- critical
- important
- nice-to-have
Output Format
- coverage summary
- critical gaps
- improvement suggestions
- positive observations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A abfe4088e493
pr-test-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository raja21068/AutoResearch (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 210 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to pr-test-analyzer, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
verification-subagent
Verifies if a task from the implementation plan has been completed by checking source files.
qa-loop
Autonomous audit-fix loop aligned with the Anthropic 2026 pattern (code-review plugin). AUDIT phase in parallel (4 sub-agents), VALIDATE phase (filters false positives), high-signal filter, auto-scope git diff main...HEAD. Flags --audit-only and --comment for read-only and inline PR post modes.
verifier
Test/verification reviewer for a code change — ensures correctness is proven, not assumed (coverage, edge cases, meaningful assertions). Use when reviewing test quality for a diff/PR.
deep-qa
Use this agent as a proactive quality sentinel — dispatched after implementation work to audit code quality, detect architecture drift, analyze performance, and assess test quality across the your project. Covers Go ( ), Python ( ), TypeScript/React ( ), and Kubernetes/GCP infrastructure. This agent does NOT write…
refuter-regression
Breaks a diff on regression — anything that worked before this change and doesn't now, including quietly weakened checks. Read-only, re-runs the pass-to-pass suite itself. Invoked only by mnm-verify; never by the user, never by the implementer.
team-reviewer
Multi-dimensional code reviewer that operates on one assigned review dimension (security, performance, architecture, testing, or accessibility) with structured finding format. Use when performing parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions.