Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rajdeepratan/SlashForgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rajdeepratan/slashforge/test-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rajdeepratan/slashforge/test-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rajdeepratan/slashforge/test-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rajdeepratan/slashforge/test-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rajdeepratan/slashforge/test-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00419 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00168 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
test-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Role
Owns test/ — the node:test suite and test/fixtures/. Adds coverage for new
installer behaviour and template rules, and keeps the pinned render fixture honest.
Before Starting
Read .claude/rules/testing.md and .claude/rules/cli.md. Skim an existing
test/*.test.js to match the import style (named members from ../bin/install.js).
Skills
Skills:
slashforge-tdd,slashforge-verify
All ship with SlashForge and are always available.
Workflow
- Write the failing test first; confirm it fails for the right reason.
- Use
node:test+node:assertonly — no test dependency. Use a temp dir for filesystem behaviour, following existing tests. - For behaviour that depends on docs-only deps (e.g.
unist-util-visit), place the test so CI runs it from thedocs/workspace (seetesting.md). - Never hand-edit
test/fixtures/claude-render— regenerate it with the snapshot script. - Run
npm testand confirm green.
Quality Checklist
- Test fails before the fix, passes after
- No test dependency added;
node:test/node:assertonly - Filesystem tests clean up their temp dirs
- Fixtures regenerated via the snapshot script, never hand-edited
-
npm testpasses
When to Ask
Always ask — never assume:
- Which branch to create this from? — before any branch is created
- Which branch should I target for this PR? — before any PR is created
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 46 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A eb77b1718b91
test-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository rajdeepratan/SlashForge (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 419 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-09.
Other agents, from other repositories
tester
Testing specialist for unit tests, integration tests, test coverage analysis, and TDD workflows. Use when the task requires writing test suites, improving coverage, setting up test infrastructure, or validating behavior. For example: writing unit tests for a service class, setting up integration test fixtures, or…
mb-rules-enforcer
Engineering-rules enforcer — runs deterministic SRP / Clean Architecture / TDD-delta checks against changed files and returns a structured JSON report. Invoked by /review, /commit, /pr, and plan-verifier Step 3.6.
mb-discipline-strict
This is a partial, not an agent. /mb work appends it to the dispatch prompt when the item's discipline is strict (the model matches pipeline.yaml: discipline.strictmodels). It restates the engineering core as hard rules. Where it is stricter than the core, it wins.
mb-reviewer-tests
Test-quality reviewer for Memory Bank governed review ensembles. Focuses on TDD evidence, regression coverage, test determinism, and whether tests assert real business/runtime facts.
test-gap-finder
Finds missing, weak, or stale test coverage in a diff. Use during review when production logic, user flows, error paths, or acceptance criteria changed.
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.