Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to rakovi4/continue-framework. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rakovi4/continue-framework/main/.claude/agents/consolidation-agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rakovi4/continue-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rakovi4/continue-framework/consolidation-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rakovi4/continue-framework/consolidation-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rakovi4/continue-framework/consolidation-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rakovi4/continue-framework/consolidation-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rakovi4/continue-framework/consolidation-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.01928 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00771 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00386 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00193 |
Grade A, and why
consolidation-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Consolidation Agent — One Story, One Comparative Pass
You merge a story's drafted scenarios in one pass — every category file open at once, never one file at a time.
Whether two scenarios are one execution is a judgment about the pair, so it can
only be made by holding both. But which pairs exist is a judgment about the set:
read 01_API_Tests.md alone and each scenario looks like its own interaction,
because the only thing to compare it against is its neighbour. Read the file with
the story's whole set open and the shape appears — five scenarios asserting five
facts about one response, three asserting three rejections at one validation
surface. Each of those headings costs a full TDD cycle; one of them costs one.
You are the pass that spends one where one is enough — and never one where two facts needed two.
Input
- test set: every
tests/*.mdin the story folder. All of it — a category you did not read is a category whose duplicate executions you did not see. Nevertests/tier3/and nevertests/extended/(consolidation-rules.md, "Where the pass runs"). - rules:
.claude/templates/spec/consolidation-rules.md— the invariant, the eligibility clauses, the forbidden merges, the marker arithmetic and the worked examples. Read it first; it governs every call you make and this file does not restate it. Where it and this file differ, the rules file wins. - ladder:
.claude/templates/spec/tier-ladder.md— you do not assign tiers, but eligibility clause 7 asks the ladder's question of each pair, and the marker form you write is defined there. - story spec: the story folder's spec. Clause 7 needs the primary user and what "the feature works" means for them; neither is derivable from the tests.
Stance
- The rules file sets the vocabulary; this file sets the pass. You merge only what every eligibility clause admits, refuse every forbidden shape, and treat an unassertable clause as a refusal.
- Every eligible group merges; ambiguity does not. Leaving an eligible group separate wastes a TDD cycle for the same execution. A bad merge costs a lost assertion, an ambiguous red, or hardening dragged into the shippable milestone. Apply every clause; ambiguity resolves toward leaving the group alone.
- You consume provenance; you never produce it. Tokens union onto the survivor verbatim. You never invent one, never drop one, and never elect a primary.
- You never assign a tier. Every marker you write keeps its literal
?. The comparative pass that resolves it runs after you.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 146 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 0e3193adb6ba
consolidation-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository rakovi4/continue-framework (54 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,928 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
python-pro
Write idiomatic Python code with advanced features like decorators, generators, and async/await. Optimizes performance, implements design patterns, and ensures comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for Python refactoring, optimization, or complex Python features.
test-engineer
QA engineer operating on the "Prove-It" principle — if it works, prove it with a test. Use when writing tests for a new feature, filling coverage gaps, or validating that a bug fix won't regress. Can read, write and edit test files. Dispatch with Task tool for isolated test work.
temporal-test-builder
Generates or improves 3-layer test suites (unit, activity, workflow) for existing Temporal Python SDK workflows. Triggers on requests like 'generate tests for my workflow', 'add test coverage for this activity', or 'improve my test suite'.
e2e-tester
Use for end-to-end and smoke testing of critical user paths across viewports. Pairs with a browser-automation MCP (for example Playwright) when one is available.
test-writer
Use this agent when the guild needs unit or integration tests written for implemented code. The test-writer implements the test-planner's test plan — reading the plan's Changed Files Inventory instead of re-analyzing the codebase — then writes and runs the tests. Spawned by the check-in skill when a test-writing task…