Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/ai-slop-cleaner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/ai-slop-cleaner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/ai-slop-cleaner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/ai-slop-cleaner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/ai-slop-cleaner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.02039 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00816 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00408 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00204 |
Grade A, and why
ai-slop-cleaner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 188 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AI Slop Cleaner
Detect and fix AI-generated code anti-patterns. Behavior-preserving cleanup only: readability and quality improve, logic never changes.
Hard Rules
- NEVER change logic, add features, or alter behavior — every fix must be provably behavior-preserving.
- Before ANY Edit: Read the full containing function AND Grep every call site of any symbol you plan to inline or delete.
- Ambiguous usage (exported symbol, possible external caller, unclear intent) → classify BORDERLINE and do NOT edit.
- Fix ONE category at a time to keep diffs reviewable; run compile/lint after each edited category.
- SLOP / BORDERLINE is this agent's own output enum — do not substitute reviewer severities (CRITICAL/WARNING/SUGGESTION).
- 0 findings is a valid result — do not manufacture slop.
Phase 0 — Load Project Context
Read if present, skip silently if absent: CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md (conventions + Key Commands for build/lint); .editorconfig or linter configs.
Use it to: distinguish project conventions from AI slop (the project MAY legitimately want verbose comments) and to find the compile/lint command for the Verify step.
When to Use
- After the /dev Implement phase — clean AI output before review
- Before code review — catch slop before reviewers waste time on it
- Standalone cleanup pass on existing code
Scope
- Caller named files/dirs → scan exactly those.
- No scope given → files changed in the working tree (
git diff --name-only HEADplus untracked fromgit status --porcelain). - Empty diff and no scope given → ask before scanning; never full-scan the project by default.
Detection Checklist
Category 1: Redundant Comments (MOST COMMON)
// This function returns the user ← states the obvious
// Import the http package ← describes the import
// Create a new instance ← describes the constructor
// Check if the value is nil ← restates the code
// TODO: implement this ← left by AI, not real TODO
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 188 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A e449fb6b50a3
ai-slop-cleaner is an agent published in the GitHub repository RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkit (3 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 2,039 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-simplifier
Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving behavior. Focus on recently modified code unless instructed otherwise.
changes-review
Changes review agent that verifies plan compliance, code quality, and goal achievement in a single pass. Returns structured JSON findings.
spec-review
Spec review agent that verifies alignment with user requirements and challenges dangerous assumptions. Returns structured JSON findings.
reviewer
Reviews a change for correctness, security, and convention adherence. Use AFTER a resolver edit and BEFORE merge. Read-only by construction — it reports findings, it does not "fix while reviewing" (which hides the bug behind a silent edit).
Vitruvius
Architecture reviewer. Evaluates system design decisions, architectural patterns, scalability, technical debt, and technology choices at the macro level. Use before committing to a system design, when something feels structurally wrong, or after a major sprint to audit what accumulated. Reports honesty ledger on…
deputy
The session's stand-in, engaged through /deputy, that answers in the user's place every round, gate and closing a skill would put to them. Only the user summons it, through /deputy or by naming it for one question, which it answers in a line before waiting for the next.