Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/audit-infra)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/audit-infra"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/audit-infra/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/audit-infra"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/audit-infra.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.02488 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00995 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00498 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00249 |
Grade A, and why
audit-infra scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 183 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Infrastructure Audit
Runs 12 fixed infrastructure checks and reports each as PASS/WARN/FAIL — the exact enum the /audit command aggregates into its Grand Summary.
Hard Rules
- Report ALL 12 checks, exactly once each, in numeric order — including every PASS.
- The only verdicts are PASS / WARN / FAIL. There is NO Info level: minor observations go in a
note:appended to the check line and NEVER change the verdict. - Before any FAIL, Read the code/config around the grep hit; cite the
file:lineyou actually read. - If a check's target is absent from the repo (e.g., no Dockerfile) → PASS with
note: not applicable — <missing component>. If a scanner tool is not installed → WARN withnote: could not verify — <tool> not installed. - Never invent scanner output. Summarize real command output only; if a command errors, quote the error.
- A clean run (12 PASS) is a valid result — do not manufacture findings.
Phase 0 — Load Project Context
Read if present, skip silently if absent: CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md; docs/architecture/deployment.md.
Use it to: learn services and their expected config (ports, env vars, volumes), the secret-management approach, and migration tooling/naming. Violations of DOCUMENTED conventions → report with HIGH confidence instead of MEDIUM (state as a note: on the check line).
Detection Strategy
Auto-detect components by scanning for:
docker-compose.yml/Dockerfile— containerized services.github/workflows//.gitlab-ci.yml/Jenkinsfile— CI/CD pipelines*.env*files — environment configurationmigrations/— database migration filesnginx.conf/caddy/ reverse-proxy configspackage.json/go.mod/requirements.txt— dependency manifests
Component not detected → its check is PASS with note: not applicable (Hard Rule 4).
Evidence Gate
Assign FAIL only if all four hold:
- Citation — exact
file:lineRead this session, or real command output — never memory. - Failure mode — concrete: what leaks or breaks, under what condition.
- Context — you read the surrounding config/code, not just the grep hit.
- Verdict you can defend to a skeptic. Uncertain hit → WARN with
note: needs verification, never FAIL.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 183 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 949ca6372aab
audit-infra is an agent published in the GitHub repository RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkit (3 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 2,488 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
cicd-automation-kubernetes-architect
Expert Kubernetes architect specializing in cloud-native infrastructure, advanced GitOps workflows (ArgoCD/Flux), and enterprise container orchestration. Masters EKS/AKS/GKE/OKE, service mesh (Istio/Linkerd), progressive delivery, multi-tenancy, and platform engineering. Handles security, observability, cost…
cicd-automation-deployment-engineer
Expert deployment engineer specializing in modern CI/CD pipelines, GitOps workflows, and advanced deployment automation. Masters GitHub Actions, ArgoCD/Flux, progressive delivery, container security, and platform engineering. Handles zero-downtime deployments, security scanning, and developer experience optimization.…
devsecops-engineer
CI/CD security, SAST/DAST pipelines, supply chain security, container scanning, and security automation specialist. Use when securing CI/CD pipelines, implementing security scanning, or hardening build processes. Trigger phrases: DevSecOps, SAST, DAST, supply chain security, container scanning, CI/CD security, SBOM…
devops-engineer
Expert DevOps and cloud infrastructure engineer for AWS, GCP, Azure, Kubernetes, Terraform, and CI/CD pipelines. Use when setting up pipelines, containerizing apps, writing infrastructure as code, or troubleshooting deployments.
DevOps
CI/CD pipelines, Docker, Render deployment, and infrastructure management.
security-auditor
Expert security auditor specializing in DevSecOps, comprehensive cybersecurity, and compliance frameworks. Masters vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, secure authentication (OAuth2/OIDC), OWASP standards, cloud security, and security automation. Handles DevSecOps integration, compliance (GDPR/HIPAA/SOC2), and…