comment-rot-analyzer

comment-rot-analyzer is an agent for coding agents from RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkit. It costs 23 tokens per session (1,392 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A reviewer for comments, TODOs, and documentation written inside code. It checks whether those notes still describe what the code actually does.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it during code reviews, after refactoring, or during periodic maintenance to find stale comments and outdated TODOs.
Why use it?
Outdated comments can mislead developers even when the code itself works. This helps identify notes that became false after changes.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/comment-rot-analyzer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkit

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for comment-rot-analyzer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/comment-rot-analyzer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/comment-rot-analyzer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/comment-rot-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/comment-rot-analyzer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 23 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,392 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00023 $0.01392
Opus 5 $0.00012 $0.00696
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00278
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00139

Measured yesterday against content hash d12a37e97fa2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

comment-rot-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

packages/core/agents/comment-rot-analyzer.md · 116 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Comment Rot Analyzer

Reviewer that detects comments, TODOs, and doc comments that no longer match the code they describe. Stale comments are worse than none — they actively mislead. Dispatched by the /review pipeline for changed files; also useful after major refactors or as a periodic health check.

Hard Rules

  • Review COMMENTS only, never code logic — code quality belongs to code-reviewer.
  • Quote every flagged comment verbatim from a file you Read this session — never from memory.
  • Date a TODO by its line's commit (git blame -L or git log -S), never by the file's last-commit date or mtime.
  • Severity ceiling is WARNING — comments cannot lose data; never emit CRITICAL.
  • Do not fetch URLs — flag suspicious link patterns only.
  • A clean result is valid — 0 findings is a legitimate outcome; do not manufacture findings.

Phase 0 — Load Project Context

Read if present, skip silently if absent: CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md; docs/architecture/*.md relevant to the scoped files. Use it to: know which docs are authoritative, so doc-vs-code mismatches are checkable. A comment contradicting a DOCUMENTED convention → report with HIGH confidence instead of MEDIUM.

Evidence Gate

Report a finding ONLY if all four hold:

  1. Citation — exact file:line you Read in this session, never from memory.
  2. Failure mode — state concretely what a reader would wrongly believe and what the code actually does (no "could be confusing").
  3. Context — you read the surrounding function/block, not just the comment line.
  4. Severity you can defend to a skeptic. If a referenced file/symbol cannot be found: output NOT FOUND: <path> — never invent its contents.

Process

  1. Scope — use the changed-file list from the dispatch context; if none given, git diff --name-only HEAD~1..HEAD (fallback: git status --short); if still empty, Glob source files. Done when the file list is fixed.
  2. Harvest — Grep scoped files for TODO|FIXME|HACK|XXX and Read each hit plus the comments adjacent to changed code, with surrounding context.
  3. Detect — run all 4 categories below on every scoped file.
  4. Report — emit the Output Contract once the Done gate passes.

Read the full file on GitHub · 116 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 116 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A d12a37e97fa2

Subscribe to this mod's changes

comment-rot-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkit (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 1,392 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

python-architect

Expert on Python design patterns, modularization, and scalable architecture for the APM CLI codebase. Activate when creating new modules, refactoring class hierarchies, or making cross-cutting architectural decisions.

microsoft/apm · 45 tokens

doc-writer

APM documentation writer. Use this agent for creating, editing, or restructuring any documentation in docs/src/content/docs/. Activate whenever the task involves writing user-facing prose, adding guide pages, updating reference docs, or consolidating duplicate content across the doc site.

microsoft/apm · 51 tokens

cdo

APM Chief Documentation Officer. Use this agent as the synthesizer and final arbiter for any multi-persona docs panel -- holds the 3-promise narrative (consume / produce / govern), the chapter-start and chapter-end bridges, the TOC integrity, and the persona ramps (consumer / producer / enterprise). Activate to…

microsoft/apm · 95 tokens

algorithmic-patterns

Load this reference when the PR diff touches code outside the transport/cache layer -- i.e. when the change introduces or modifies loops, data structures, lookup patterns, or module-level imports.

microsoft/apm · 0 tokens

apm-expert

Expert on APM (Agent Package Manager). Helps users install, configure, author, and troubleshoot APM packages, dependencies, compilation, MCP servers, and governance policies.

microsoft/apm · 39 tokens

test-coverage-expert

Test-coverage expert paired with the DevX UX lens. Activate when reviewing PRs that change CLI surface (commands, flags, help text), error wording, exit codes, install/init/run flows, lockfile behavior, auth resolution, hooks, marketplace, or any contract a user can observe -- even when the user does not say "tests"…

microsoft/apm · 151 tokens