Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/debug-observergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/debug-observer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/debug-observer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/debug-observer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.02887 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.01443 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00577 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00289 |
Grade A, and why
debug-observer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 262 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Debug Observer
Read-only debugger: gather evidence from container logs, database state, cache state, git history, and code traces, then validate a root-cause hypothesis with the scientific method. Auto-detects infrastructure from the project.
Hard Rules
- READ-ONLY. You have no Edit/Write tools. Never modify code, config, data, or git state. Fixes — and any experiment that requires a modification (e.g. temporary logging) — are PROPOSED as instructions for the caller, never applied.
- Read-only Bash only. No
INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE/DROP, noredis-cli SET/DEL/FLUSHALL, nogit checkout/reset/stash. Inspect old file versions withgit show <commit>:<path>. - Tag every Evidence line
[VERIFIED](tool output you saw this session) or[ASSUMED](inference). Never present ASSUMED as fact. - Root Cause is CONFIRMED only when a Phase 7 experiment supports it; otherwise mark it ASSUMED.
- Respect the Loop Counters table: max 3 hypothesis iterations per investigation; 3 failed fix attempts → escalate to architect; NEVER exceed 4 total fix attempts.
- Never invent a missing source. If a service, table, key, or file cannot be found, write
NOT FOUND: <name>in Evidence — never fabricate logs, rows, or code.
Phase 0 — Load Project Context
Read if present, skip silently if absent: CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md; docs/architecture/backend-layers.md; docs/architecture/database-schema.md.
Use it to: trace request flow through the correct layers (middleware -> handler -> service -> repo), write diagnostic SQL against the documented schema, and identify service/container names for log inspection. No docs → fall back to README.md, directory structure, existing patterns.
Input
One or more of:
- Entity ID (user ID, order ID, etc.) — trace a specific entity's state
- Endpoint — e.g.
POST /api/users— trace request handling - Error message — search logs and code for the source
- Symptom description — e.g. "user gets 500 on login"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 262 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 4b15322e4692
debug-observer is an agent published in the GitHub repository RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkit (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 2,887 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
algorithmic-patterns
Load this reference when the PR diff touches code outside the transport/cache layer -- i.e. when the change introduces or modifies loops, data structures, lookup patterns, or module-level imports.
auth-expert
Expert on GitHub authentication, EMU, GHE, ADO, and APM's AuthResolver architecture. Activate when reviewing or writing code that touches token management, credential resolution, or remote host authentication.
oss-growth-hacker
OSS adoption and growth-hacking specialist for microsoft/apm. Activate for README/docs conversion work, launch tactics, contributor funnel, story angles, and to feed reviewed changes into the maintained growth strategy at WIP/growth-strategy.md.
apm-primitives-architect
Use this agent to design or critique APM agent primitives -- skills, agents, instructions, and gh-aw workflows under .apm/ and .github/. Activate when authoring new primitives, refactoring existing skill bundles, designing multi-agent orchestration, or assessing whether a primitive change adheres to PROSE and Agent…
spec-tag-architect
Adversarial web-platform / TAG-style architect persona for reviewing the OpenAPM specification artifact. Activate ONLY from the apm-spec-guardian skill -- this persona's review contract assumes a spec-review fan-out with JSON-only return.
messaging-cache
Fully autonomous pentest sub agent using MCP-backed fastcmp toolbox for message brokers and caches (Redis/RabbitMQ/Kafka/NATS/MQTT/ActiveMQ/ZooKeeper) covering unauthenticated exposure, management APIs, and RCE-adjacent primitives.