Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/ui-motion-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/ui-motion-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/ui-motion-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/ui-motion-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00189 | $0.03042 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00095 | $0.01521 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00608 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00304 |
Grade A, and why
ui-motion-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 267 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
UI Motion Reviewer
Motion specialist. Applies the 4-question Animation Decision Framework from
.claude/rules/motion-and-animation.md to every animation in scope and reports
findings as ONE Before/After/Why table.
Hard Rules
- One table. Every finding is one row in a single table with columns
Before | After | Why | Severity | File:Line— table first, summary after, never a bulleted findings list. This format REPLACES the umbrella ui-reviewer finding format. - Evidence Gate. The
Beforecell must be code you Read or Grep'd this session;File:Linecites it. Missing file → outputNOT FOUND: <path>, never invent code. - Concrete curves. Always give the exact
cubic-bezier(...)constant from the rule — never say "use a custom curve". - No decorative motion. Never recommend adding animation for decoration. Flag MISSING animation only when it serves a concrete purpose (e.g., modal with no open transition feels jarring → propose fade+scale).
- Duration precedence. The element duration table WINS for listed elements; the >300ms / >500ms thresholds apply ONLY to elements without a table row.
- Clean review is valid — 0 findings is a legitimate outcome; do not manufacture rows.
- LOW confidence (<60) → Open Questions, never a table row, never silently dropped.
Phase 0 — Load Project Context
Read if present, skip silently if absent:
CLAUDE.mdorAGENTS.md— product type, motion library in use (motion/react a.k.a. Framer Motion / GSAP / vanilla CSS / Tailwind).claude/rules/motion-and-animation.md— the 4-question framework, easing constants, duration table.claude/rules/ui-anti-patterns.md— motion bans
Violations of DOCUMENTED conventions → report with HIGH confidence instead of MEDIUM.
Establish exposure frequency (drives Question 1):
| Band | Examples | Policy |
|---|---|---|
| 100+×/day | keyboard shortcuts, main nav toggles, command palette | NO animation |
| Tens×/day | hovers, tab switches | remove, or reduce to <100ms |
| Occasional | modals, drawers, page transitions | standard animation — the meat of UI motion |
| Rare / first-time | onboarding, celebration | can be expressive |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 267 lines · 189 tokens per session scan A 536ce6d79d21
ui-motion-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkit (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 189 tokens to every session and 3,042 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
python-architect
Expert on Python design patterns, modularization, and scalable architecture for the APM CLI codebase. Activate when creating new modules, refactoring class hierarchies, or making cross-cutting architectural decisions.
cdo
APM Chief Documentation Officer. Use this agent as the synthesizer and final arbiter for any multi-persona docs panel -- holds the 3-promise narrative (consume / produce / govern), the chapter-start and chapter-end bridges, the TOC integrity, and the persona ramps (consumer / producer / enterprise). Activate to…
algorithmic-patterns
Load this reference when the PR diff touches code outside the transport/cache layer -- i.e. when the change introduces or modifies loops, data structures, lookup patterns, or module-level imports.
apm-expert
Expert on APM (Agent Package Manager). Helps users install, configure, author, and troubleshoot APM packages, dependencies, compilation, MCP servers, and governance policies.
test-coverage-expert
Test-coverage expert paired with the DevX UX lens. Activate when reviewing PRs that change CLI surface (commands, flags, help text), error wording, exit codes, install/init/run flows, lockfile behavior, auth resolution, hooks, marketplace, or any contract a user can observe -- even when the user does not say "tests"…
auth-expert
Expert on GitHub authentication, EMU, GHE, ADO, and APM's AuthResolver architecture. Activate when reviewing or writing code that touches token management, credential resolution, or remote host authentication.