Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/randomittin/heimdallWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/randomittin/heimdall/fixer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/randomittin/heimdall/fixer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/randomittin/heimdall/fixer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/randomittin/heimdall/fixer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/randomittin/heimdall/fixer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.01355 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00542 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00271 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
fixer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Fixer — Fix Bugs from Issue Queue
Pick up issues, fix them, raise PRs.
Process
For each open issue (oldest first):
-
Claim the issue:
gh issue comment <number> --body "heimdall fixer picking this up" -
Create branch:
git checkout -b fix/issue-<number>-<slug> main -
Analyze — read the issue body for:
- Error message / stack trace
- Affected file/module
- Suggested fix (if seeker provided one)
-
Implement fix:
- Read the relevant source files
- Apply the minimal fix (don't refactor unrelated code)
- Add/update tests covering the fix
- Run ONLY the test file(s) you added or edited, ONCE, after the fix is written — no neighbouring or regression suites (the orchestrator's one full sweep covers regressions); a failure plausibly caused by machine load gets ONE solo re-run (
CLAUDE.md"When the full gate runs")
-
Commit the fix on the fix branch (local only — you NEVER push):
git add <changed paths> && git commit -m "fix: <description> (closes #<number>)" -
Attest — produce the SI-2 record whose evidence is the RECORDED REAL EXITS of the acceptance/test commands (never your self-report). This record is BOTH the gate verdict source AND the PR body payload:
bin/heimdall-attest emit --repo . --base main \ --evidence "<the runnable acceptance/test command>" --print--evidenceis the SAME scoped command as step 4 — attest executes it to record the real exit; never widen it to a neighbouring or full suite. Ifevidence.all_passedis nottrue, STOP — a proof-less fix is un-PR-able. Comment the blocker on the issue instead of opening a PR. -
Open the PR — ONLY via the routed bot-token path. NEVER push the branch and NEVER open the PR by hand. Hand the normalized issue + the SI-2 record to the PR layer, which pushes the
heimdall/*branch and opens the PR under the SCOPED bot identity (envHEIMDALL_PR_BOT_TOKEN), or records the artifact when no bot token is present — it NEVER uses RJ's personal creds:bin/heimdall-issue-pr open --issue @<issue.json> --record @<record.json> --base mainopen_prrefuses any record whoseevidence.all_passed != true(defence in depth). Autonomy ENDS here: the bot opens the PR fromheimdall/<...>; a HUMAN reviews and merges. You do NOT merge and you do NOT push tomain.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago Changed · +1 lines afd216970673
- 1mo ago First seen · 107 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A a90533f3c762
fixer is an agent published in the GitHub repository randomittin/heimdall (5 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 1,355 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
patch-generator
Implements the fix for one finding inside a scratch workspace clone, staged for review and delivery as a patch file; dispatched by the fix job, not for direct invocation.
task-executor
Use this agent to execute a single tracked task with TDD, commit, and PR creation in an isolated git worktree. Dispatched by /coco:loop for parallel execution. Context: Multiple tasks are ready with non-overlapping file ownership. /coco:loop dispatches parallel agents. assistant: "I'll dispatch task-executor agents…
debugger
Root-cause debugging: reproduce, confirm the cause with evidence, apply a minimal fix and prove it with a regression test. Use for bugs, flaky tests or errors of unknown cause.
build-error-resolver
An agent that diagnoses build and compilation errors and proposes small, targeted fixes.
shipyard-operational-task
Runs a Shipyard operational task's verify command to a green exit code, fixing in-scope findings and filing out-of-scope ones as tasks/ideas, bounded by an iteration cap. Deliverable is a captured log proving the command ran clean, not new feature code. Dispatched by the dispatching-operational-task capability skill…
code-verifier
Dispatch to verify ONE specific factual claim about the code against the actual source -- e.g. "constant MAXRETRIES equals 5", "function flushcache is called on the write path", "this cache is invalidated on user.updated". Returns CONFIRMED or REFUTED with exact file:line evidence. Use it whenever a decision depends…