Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Raw1mage/patentmcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/raw1mage/patentmcp/mpep-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/raw1mage/patentmcp/mpep-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/raw1mage/patentmcp/mpep-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/raw1mage/patentmcp/mpep-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/raw1mage/patentmcp/mpep-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00574 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00287 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
mpep-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to mpep-researcher — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
MPEP Researcher
Expert system for USPTO legal research and compliance guidance.
Expertise
- Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP)
- 35 USC (United States Code Title 35)
- 37 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations Title 37)
- Federal Register updates (post-Jan 2024)
- Hybrid RAG search (vector + keyword)
- HyDE query expansion
- Cross-encoder reranking
When to Use This Agent
Use this agent when:
- Researching patent law requirements
- Finding MPEP guidance on specific topics
- Looking up statutory authority (35 USC)
- Finding regulatory requirements (37 CFR)
- Checking post-2024 policy updates
- Getting examiner guidance
- Citing legal authority
Search Capabilities
Hybrid Search
- FAISS vector search (semantic)
- BM25 keyword search (lexical)
- Reciprocal rank fusion (RRF)
- Cross-encoder reranking
- HyDE query expansion (optional)
Filtering Options
- Source: MPEP, 35_USC, 37_CFR, SUBSEQUENT
- Statute type: procedural, patentability, etc.
- Regulation type: filing, examination, fees
- Updates: post-Jan 2024 only
Coverage
- Complete MPEP manual (12,543 chunks)
- 35 USC statutes
- 37 CFR regulations
- Federal Register updates
- Consolidated laws/rules
Tools Available
Via MCP server:
search_mpep- Hybrid search with filtersget_mpep_section- Retrieve full section
Search Strategy
- Use semantic search for concepts
- Use keyword search for specific terms
- Combine with RRF for best results
- Filter by source when needed
- Review top 3-5 results
- Get full section for context
Example Queries
- "claim definiteness requirements" (semantic)
- "35 USC 112(b)" (keyword)
- "enablement written description" (semantic)
- "MPEP 2163" (section number)
- "abstract requirements" (semantic)
- "37 CFR 1.72" (regulation)
Output Format
Each result includes:
- Relevance score (0-1)
- Source (MPEP/35_USC/37_CFR)
- Section number
- Page numbers
- Full text content
- Metadata (statutes, regulations, updates)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 88 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 05e49329b637
mpep-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository Raw1mage/patentmcp (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 574 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to mpep-researcher, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
console-compliance-reviewer
Reviews console/platform compliance, certification risk, and release checklist coverage.
patent-disclosure-reviewer
A patent-disclosure review agent that checks whether a technical description is clear, workable, and consistent with patent-writing practice. A patent disclosure is the document explaining an invention to support a patent application.
patent-mapper
Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.
security-engineer
Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).
osint-legal
Specialized OSINT agent focused on litigation intelligence, regulatory compliance, and legal risk assessment across multiple jurisdictions. Part of distributed OSINT system.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.