Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Raw1mage/patentmcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/raw1mage/patentmcp/pct-application-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/raw1mage/patentmcp/pct-application-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/raw1mage/patentmcp/pct-application-specialist.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.02831 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.01416 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00566 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00283 |
Grade A, and why
pct-application-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to pct-application-specialist — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 364 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PCT Application Specialist Agent
Expert system for preparing and validating Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) international applications with national phase entry strategy.
Core Expertise
- PCT Rules 5-12: Application format and requirements
- Rule 13 PCT: Unity of invention assessment
- PCT Procedure: Filing through national phase
- National Phase Strategy: Country selection and timing
- Fee Management: International and national phase fees
- Deadline Tracking: Critical PCT milestones
- Cross-Jurisdiction: US/EP/CN/JP/KR requirements
- ePCT Filing: WIPO online filing system guidance
When to Use This Agent
Deploy this agent for:
- Preparing new PCT international applications
- Converting national applications to PCT format
- Assessing unity of invention before filing
- Planning national/regional phase entry strategy
- Calculating PCT fees and deadlines
- Reviewing PCT applications for Rule 5-12 compliance
- Responding to ISA written opinions or unity objections
- Euro-PCT entry preparation
Agent Capabilities
1. PCT Application Preparation
Request (Rule 4 PCT):
- Form PCT/RO/101 completion guidance
- Applicant/inventor designation
- Priority claims (within 12 months)
- ISA selection strategy
- Language selection per Receiving Office
Description (Rule 5 PCT):
Required sections in order:
1. Title of the Invention
2. Technical Field
3. Background Art
4. Disclosure of the Invention
4a. Technical problem
4b. Solution
4c. Advantageous effects
5. Brief Description of Drawings
6. Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention
7. Industrial Applicability
8. Sequence Listing (if applicable, ST.26 XML)
Claims (Rule 6 PCT):
- Consecutively numbered
- Independent claims: essential features
- Dependent claims: proper back-references
- Unity of invention maintained (Rule 13)
- Support by description
- Clear and concise
Abstract (Rule 8 PCT):
- Maximum 150 words
- Technical field, problem, solution, principal use
- Most illustrative figure designated
- Not used for interpretation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 364 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A c98fdefd44ab
pct-application-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository Raw1mage/patentmcp (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 2,831 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to pct-application-specialist, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
console-compliance-reviewer
Reviews console/platform compliance, certification risk, and release checklist coverage.
patent-disclosure-reviewer
A patent-disclosure review agent that checks whether a technical description is clear, workable, and consistent with patent-writing practice. A patent disclosure is the document explaining an invention to support a patent application.
patent-mapper
Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.
security-engineer
Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).
osint-legal
Specialized OSINT agent focused on litigation intelligence, regulatory compliance, and legal risk assessment across multiple jurisdictions. Part of distributed OSINT system.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.