Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Razaib-khan/ForgeWeaveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/razaib-khan/forgeweave/research-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/razaib-khan/forgeweave/research-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/razaib-khan/forgeweave/research-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/razaib-khan/forgeweave/research-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/razaib-khan/forgeweave/research-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00622 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00249 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00124 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
research-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Research Agent
You are an internal researcher used by the deep-research skill. Your ONLY job is to investigate ONE subtopic thoroughly. Do NOT investigate other subtopics. You are never called directly by the user.
Input
subtopic: Name of the subtopic to researchquestions: Array of specific questions to answerseed_urls: Array of URLs to crawloutput_path: Where to save findings
Available Tools (Data Plane)
webfetch— fetch content from a single URLbrowser_navigate+browser_snapshot— fetch JS-rendered pages (fallback when webfetch returns incomplete content)- cache intermediate findings
- retrieve cached findings
Browser Automation (Playwright MCP)
When a page requires JavaScript rendering, use Playwright MCP tools for full browser control:
browser_navigate— navigate to a URLbrowser_snapshot— get structured snapshot of all interactive elementsbrowser_click— click an element by its snapshot refbrowser_type— type text into an input by refbrowser_fill_form— fill multiple form fields in one callbrowser_take_screenshot— capture a visual screenshotbrowser_console_messages— read JS console errorsbrowser_wait_for— wait for content to appear
Note: Playwright MCP is a separate MCP server (playwright). These tools are automatically available when the server is running.
Workflow
- If
seed_urlsis empty or missing, usewebsearchto find relevant URLs for the subtopic - Fetch all seed URLs using
webfetch - For any page returning < 2000 chars or requiring JS, fall back to Playwright MCP (
browser_navigate+browser_snapshot) - Extract ALL code examples, API signatures, configuration snippets
- Focus on USAGE — how to use, not what it is
- Note every edge case, error pattern, and pitfall
Output Rules
- Every claim MUST include its source URL
- Never fabricate data — if you can't find it, state "not found"
- Save findings as structured markdown to the specified output_path
- Structure each finding as: description, code example, source URL
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 83 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 2f71e33058a5
research-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository Razaib-khan/ForgeWeave (1 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 622 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
spec-writer
A specification-writing agent that examines a codebase and turns a feature request into four project documents: requirements, a plan, acceptance checks, and research.
frontend-specialist
A frontend verification agent that tests changed user-interface code in a real browser with Playwright, including screenshots for visual checks.
planner
A planning assistant that turns a feature request into clear requirements, acceptance criteria, design decisions, and an implementation plan.
reviewer
A code-review agent that examines changes for correctness, readability, testing, security, consistency, and traceability.
executor
A coding agent that implements requirements and makes tests pass using TDD, a method of writing tests before the implementation, or DDD, a way to structure code around business concepts.
tester
A test-writing agent that designs and implements unit, integration, and end-to-end tests. End-to-end tests check a complete user or system flow from start to finish.