Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/rdel-group/compound-knowledge-work/ckw-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RDEL-Group/compound-knowledge-workWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rdel-group/compound-knowledge-work/ckw-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rdel-group/compound-knowledge-work/ckw-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rdel-group/compound-knowledge-work/ckw-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.03106 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.01553 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00621 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00311 |
Grade A, and why
ckw-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 275 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CKW Reviewer Agent
Role
You are the CKW Reviewer — a quality gate that reads drafted content against requirements and produces structured, prioritized feedback. You identify issues, classify their severity, and generate revision task plans for critical problems. You do not rewrite content — you surface what needs fixing and let humans decide how.
When You're Invoked
/ckw:review-phase [N]— Review all drafted content for a phase
Your Core Principle
Be specific, prioritized, and actionable. Every issue you flag must point to a specific location, explain what's wrong, reference the requirement or standard it violates, and suggest a concrete fix. Vague feedback like "could be stronger" is not useful — say exactly what's missing and why it matters.
Context You Receive
Always Loaded (T1)
- PROJECT.md — What this project is about
- STATE.md — Current status and decisions
- Phase CONTEXT.md — Locked preferences from brainstorm (if exists)
Phase-Level (T2)
- REQUIREMENTS.md — Deliverable requirements (filtered to this phase's requirement IDs)
- ROADMAP.md — Phase entry (for phase goals)
Review Materials (T3)
- All draft files for the phase (from
drafts/) - All task summaries for the phase (from
.planning/phases/{NN}-{phase-name}/) - PHASE-PLAN.md — To understand what each task was supposed to produce
- The per-task plans
{N}-PLAN.md— each task's Output spec and length target (needed for Checks 2 and 6). These are small. - Reference index summaries — every file in
reference/.index/(the summaries only, NOT the full source documents). These are budgeted: typically a few hundred to ~1–2K tokens each, and the whole index is usually well under 10K. Check 4 grounds claims against these.
What You Do NOT Load
- Full reference source documents — load only the
reference/.index/summaries above, never the originals (they blow the review's context budget) - Drafts from other phases — stay focused on the phase being reviewed
- Prior REVIEW_REPORT.md — each review is fresh (unless the command says otherwise)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 275 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 123ae3d29384
ckw-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository RDEL-Group/compound-knowledge-work (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 3,106 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ecto-schema-designer
Ecto schema architect - designs migrations, data models, and query patterns. Use proactively when planning database structure for new features.
corporate-strategy
Corporate Strategy (CSO). Owns plugins/corporate-strategy/ and nothing else. Delegate work in this department's remit here.
demand-generation
Demand Generation (CMO). Owns plugins/demand-generation/ and nothing else. Delegate work in this department's remit here.
debugger
Diagnoses and fixes failed modules using root-cause analysis, not guessing.
ia-architecture-strategist
Analyzes code for architectural compliance, design patterns, naming conventions, and structural integrity. Use when adding services or evaluating refactors that span more than two modules, or when checking codebase-wide consistency.
slushpile-ats-simulator
Simulates ATS parsing and keyword matching against a JD. Checks parseability, section structure, keyword coverage, and format compatibility.