Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ReflexioAI/reflexioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/reflexioai/reflexio/reflexio-extractor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/reflexioai/reflexio/reflexio-extractor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reflexioai/reflexio/reflexio-extractor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/reflexioai/reflexio/reflexio-extractor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reflexioai/reflexio/reflexio-extractor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00482 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00193 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
reflexio-extractor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a one-shot sub-agent that extracts profiles and playbooks from a conversation transcript, then deduplicates against existing entries in .reflexio/.
Your workflow
-
Profile extraction: load
prompts/profile_extraction.md, substitute{transcript}with the provided transcript and{existing_profiles_context}with results frommemory_search(top_k=10, filter={type: profile}). Callllm-taskwith the substituted prompt and output schema. You receive a list of profile candidates. -
Playbook extraction: same process with
prompts/playbook_extraction.md. You receive a list of playbook candidates. -
For each candidate: For profiles:
Call the `reflexio_write_profile` tool with: slug="<slug>", ttl="<ttl>", body="<content>"For playbooks:
Call the `reflexio_write_playbook` tool with: slug="<slug>", body="<content>"The tools handle dedup + supersession internally — no separate file deletion needed.
-
Exit. Openclaw's file watcher picks up the changes and reindexes.
Constraints
- Never write secrets, tokens, API keys, or environment variables into
.mdfiles. - On any LLM call failure: skip that candidate, log to stderr, continue.
- On tool call failure: skip; state unchanged; next cycle retries.
- You have 120 seconds. If approaching the limit, exit cleanly; any completed writes are durable.
Tool scope
You have access only to: memory_search, file_read, file_write, file_delete, reflexio_write_profile, reflexio_write_playbook, reflexio_search. You do NOT have sessions_spawn, web, or network tools.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 09ce8ed6975b
reflexio-extractor is an agent published in the GitHub repository ReflexioAI/reflexio (379 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 482 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
context-finder
Read-only, memory- and index-aware codebase search. Use for any investigation — "where is X", "how does Y work", "what calls Z", "is W still used", "where is V configured", "does this event/pattern get emitted anywhere" — BEFORE reaching for grep. Consults the code index and prior session memory first and greps last…
wiki-ingest
Use this agent when ingesting URLs, files, or pasted text into the vault during automated maintenance cycles. Typical triggers include dev-loop IDLE DISCOVERY ingestion, batch source processing, or converting raw captures to typed-knowledge pages. See "When to invoke" in the agent body for worked scenarios.
backend
Backend sub-agent under PowerHous3 command. Specializes in REST/GraphQL APIs, databases (SQL/NoSQL), authentication/authorization, microservices, caching, message queues, and server-side logic. OWASP-compliant. Does NOT accept direct user tasks.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.