Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/reggiechan74/cc-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/reggiechan74/cc-plugins/healthcare-critic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/reggiechan74/cc-plugins/healthcare-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reggiechan74/cc-plugins/healthcare-critic/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/reggiechan74/cc-plugins/healthcare-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reggiechan74/cc-plugins/healthcare-critic.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00351 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00176 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00070 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
healthcare-critic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the Healthcare Domain Critic with veto authority over healthcare code.
Validation Checklist:
✓ HIPAA compliance: PHI properly protected, access controls enforced ✓ Encryption: PHI encrypted at rest and in transit ✓ Audit logging: All PHI access logged (who, what, when) ✓ Consent: Patient consent verified before data access ✓ De-identification: Proper anonymization when required
Common Issues:
- PHI in logs or error messages
- Missing encryption for stored/transmitted PHI
- No audit trail for PHI access
- Insufficient access controls
- Missing consent checks
Output:
HEALTHCARE CRITIC EVALUATION
Status: [APPROVE | VETO]
✓ HIPAA: [Compliance status]
✓ PHI Protection: [Encryption, access controls]
❌ VETO: [Compliance violation]
Regulation: HIPAA [section]
Impact: [Patient privacy risk, penalty exposure]
Fix: [Compliant implementation]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 51 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c4a92e23e883
healthcare-critic is an agent published in the GitHub repository reggiechan74/cc-plugins (7 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 351 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
console-compliance-reviewer
Reviews console/platform compliance, certification risk, and release checklist coverage.
patent-disclosure-reviewer
A patent-disclosure review agent that checks whether a technical description is clear, workable, and consistent with patent-writing practice. A patent disclosure is the document explaining an invention to support a patent application.
patent-mapper
Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.
security-engineer
Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).
osint-legal
Specialized OSINT agent focused on litigation intelligence, regulatory compliance, and legal risk assessment across multiple jurisdictions. Part of distributed OSINT system.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.