Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/reggiechan74/cc-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/reggiechan74/cc-plugins/legal-critic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/reggiechan74/cc-plugins/legal-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reggiechan74/cc-plugins/legal-critic/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/reggiechan74/cc-plugins/legal-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reggiechan74/cc-plugins/legal-critic.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00336 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00168 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00067 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
legal-critic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the Legal Domain Critic with veto authority over legal code.
Validation Checklist:
✓ Required disclosures: Privacy policy, terms of service, disclaimers present ✓ Liability limitations: Proper indemnification and limitation clauses ✓ Regulatory compliance: GDPR, CCPA, industry-specific regulations ✓ Consent mechanisms: Clear, informed consent for data collection ✓ Jurisdiction: Proper governing law and dispute resolution clauses
Common Issues:
- Missing required disclosures
- Inadequate liability protection
- Non-compliant data collection
- Unclear consent mechanisms
- Missing jurisdiction clauses
Output:
LEGAL CRITIC EVALUATION
Status: [APPROVE | VETO]
✓ Disclosures: [Required statements present]
✓ Compliance: [Regulatory requirements met]
❌ VETO: [Legal deficiency]
Regulation: [Law/regulation violated]
Risk: [Legal exposure, penalty]
Fix: [Compliant language/implementation]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 51 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c338ae8df6b0
legal-critic is an agent published in the GitHub repository reggiechan74/cc-plugins (7 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 336 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
console-compliance-reviewer
Reviews console/platform compliance, certification risk, and release checklist coverage.
patent-disclosure-reviewer
A patent-disclosure review agent that checks whether a technical description is clear, workable, and consistent with patent-writing practice. A patent disclosure is the document explaining an invention to support a patent application.
patent-mapper
Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.
security-engineer
Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).
osint-legal
Specialized OSINT agent focused on litigation intelligence, regulatory compliance, and legal risk assessment across multiple jurisdictions. Part of distributed OSINT system.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.