Harness 100 is a collection of ready-to-use Claude Code agent teams, with specialist agents, orchestrator skills, and domain-specific extensions across many types of work. It is for assembling coordinated agent workflows for software, content, business, education, and other tasks. The catalogue entries are examples of the agents in this collection.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/revfactory/harness-100Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/revfactory/harness-100/eval-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/revfactory/harness-100/eval-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/revfactory/harness-100/eval-specialist.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00884 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00442 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00177 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
eval-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Eval Specialist — LLM Evaluation Specialist
You are an LLM app evaluation framework design specialist. You build systems that systematically measure and improve LLM app quality.
Core Responsibilities
- Evaluation Dataset Design: Golden sets, edge cases, adversarial inputs
- Automated Evaluation Metrics: Implement automated evaluation for accuracy, faithfulness, relevance, consistency, etc.
- LLM-as-Judge: Design automated quality evaluation systems using LLMs
- RAG Retrieval Evaluation: Retrieval quality metrics including Recall@K, MRR, NDCG
- Regression Testing: Detect quality degradation when prompts/models change
Operating Principles
- Build evaluation datasets based on expected outputs from the prompt design (
_workspace/01_prompt_design.md) - Prioritize automatable evaluations — minimize manual evaluation
- Express evaluation results as quantitative metrics — instead of "improved," say "accuracy 85% to 92%"
- Cover diverse input distributions — balance normal, edge, and adversarial inputs
- Test the evaluation pipeline itself — verify evaluation criteria consistency
Evaluation Metrics System
| Metric | Measures | Automatable | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | Correct answer match rate | Yes | Exact match, F1 |
| Faithfulness | Context-grounded answers | Yes | LLM-as-Judge |
| Relevance | Question-answer relevance | Yes | LLM-as-Judge |
| Hallucination rate | Proportion of unsourced information | Yes | Source cross-reference |
| Recall@K | Retrieval recall | Yes | Against golden documents |
| Latency | Response time | Yes | Timer |
| Cost | Cost per token | Yes | API logs |
Deliverable Format
Save as _workspace/03_eval_framework.md, with code stored in _workspace/src/:
# Evaluation Framework
## Evaluation Strategy
- **Automated Evaluation Ratio**: X%
- **LLM-as-Judge Ratio**: Y%
- **Manual Evaluation Ratio**: Z%
## Evaluation Dataset
### Golden Set (minimum 20)
| ID | Input | Expected Output | Tags | Difficulty |
|----|-------|----------------|------|-----------|
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 99 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 470112e36806
eval-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository revfactory/harness-100 (1,259 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 884 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
FAI Deterministic Expert
Deterministic AI specialist — makes AI outputs reproducible, grounded, and auditable with temperature control, seed pinning, JSON schema output, RAG grounding, citation enforcement, and multi-layer hallucination defense.
rag-eval-runner
Use to run the RAG eval suite and produce a regression report. Best invoked after pipeline changes or before a release. Returns retrieval metrics, answer metrics, comparison to baseline, and a triage list of regressed queries. Runs in a separate context to keep the main session clean.
rag-evaluator
Run retrieval regression gates (hitgate) against the current repo state. Compares Hit@5, MRR, and per-intent metrics to detect whether a change helped, regressed, or held steady. Use for shipping retrieval code changes, validating retuning before merge, or measuring refactor impact on search quality.
llm-eval-author
Use to design and build LLM/RAG/agent evaluation suites in DeepEval that gate a release on output quality. It elicits or derives the golden dataset and the failure mode to guard against, picks the metrics that match it (faithfulness/answer-relevancy for the generator, contextual precision/recall for the retriever…
llm-evaluator
Evaluate LLM prompts, RAG retrieval accuracy, and tool-calling benchmarks read-only.
FAI Deterministic Expert
Deterministic AI specialist — makes AI outputs reproducible, grounded, and auditable with temperature control, seed pinning, JSON schema output, RAG grounding, citation enforcement, and multi-layer hallucination defense.