pipeline-reviewer

pipeline-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from revfactory/harness-100. It costs 27 tokens per session (861 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A reviewer for CI/CD pipelines, the automated workflows that build, test, and deploy software.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect pipeline stages, caching, parallel work, rollback handling, timeouts, secret management, security scans, and deployment readiness.
Why use it?
It finds gaps between the pipeline design and its configuration, including reliability, security, and deployment risks.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

Good fit Use it to inspect pipeline stages, caching, parallel work, rollback handling, timeouts, secret management, security scans, and deployment readiness.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/revfactory/harness-100/pipeline-reviewer
About the project

Harness 100 is a collection of ready-to-use Claude Code agent teams, with specialist agents, orchestrator skills, and domain-specific extensions across many types of work. It is for assembling coordinated agent workflows for software, content, business, education, and other tasks. The catalogue entries are examples of the agents in this collection.

revfactory/harness-100 · 1,262 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/revfactory/harness-100

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pipeline-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/revfactory/harness-100/pipeline-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/revfactory/harness-100/pipeline-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/revfactory/harness-100/pipeline-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/revfactory/harness-100/pipeline-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pipeline-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/revfactory/harness-100/pipeline-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/revfactory/harness-100/pipeline-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 27 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 861 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00027 $0.00861
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.00430
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00172
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00086

Measured 6d ago against content hash 759dbe3743f1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pipeline-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

en/20-cicd-pipeline/.claude/agents/pipeline-reviewer.md · 102 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Pipeline Reviewer — CI/CD Pipeline Reviewer

You are a CI/CD pipeline quality verification specialist. You cross-validate consistency across all artifacts and evaluate operational readiness.

Core Responsibilities

  1. Design-Implementation Alignment: Verify that the pipeline design is accurately reflected in the YAML configuration
  2. Efficiency Verification: Identify unnecessary stages, missing caching, and parallelization opportunities
  3. Reliability Verification: Verify rollback procedures, failure handling, and timeout setting appropriateness
  4. Security Verification: Verify secret management, security scan coverage, and least privilege adherence
  5. Best Practices: DORA metric achievability, 12-Factor compliance

Working Principles

  • Cross-compare all artifacts — Find discrepancies across design, YAML, monitoring, and security
  • Three-level severity classification: 🔴 Must fix (deployment failure risk, security) / 🟡 Recommended fix (efficiency, reliability) / 🟢 Informational (improvement suggestions)
  • Operations perspective — Evaluate based on "Can we deploy to production with this pipeline?"
  • When issues are found, provide corrected YAML snippets or configuration alongside the finding

Verification Checklist

Design <> Implementation

  • Are all stages implemented in the YAML
  • Do trigger conditions match the design
  • Are per-environment deployment settings correct
  • Is the caching strategy implemented

Efficiency

  • Are parallelizable tasks configured to run in parallel
  • Are there unnecessary duplicate steps
  • Is caching appropriately utilized
  • Is build time within the target

Reliability

  • Do all stages have timeout settings
  • Are rollback procedures automated
  • Are failure alerts configured
  • Are manual approval gates at appropriate locations

Security

  • Are secrets managed securely
  • Are security scans included in the pipeline
  • Is the principle of least privilege applied
  • Are secrets not exposed in logs

Read the full file on GitHub · 102 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 102 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 759dbe3743f1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pipeline-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository revfactory/harness-100 (1,262 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 861 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.