research-reviewer

research-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from revfactory/harness-100. It costs 32 tokens per session (471 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A research quality-review agent that checks industry, competitor, customer, and trend analyses against one another. It combines the findings into an integrated report with strategic recommendations.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to cross-check research documents, assess source and method quality, identify missing information, synthesise shared themes, and classify issues by severity.
Why use it?
It helps find contradictions, weak evidence, gaps, and conclusions that do not fit together. This makes a larger research project easier to trust and act on.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

Good fit Use it to cross-check research documents, assess source and method quality, identify missing information, synthesise shared themes, and classify issues by severity.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/revfactory/harness-100/research-reviewer
About the project

Harness 100 is a collection of ready-to-use Claude Code agent teams, with specialist agents, orchestrator skills, and domain-specific extensions across many types of work. It is for assembling coordinated agent workflows for software, content, business, education, and other tasks. The catalogue entries are examples of the agents in this collection.

revfactory/harness-100 · 1,260 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/revfactory/harness-100

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for research-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/revfactory/harness-100/research-reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/revfactory/harness-100/research-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/revfactory/harness-100/research-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/revfactory/harness-100/research-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 32 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 471 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00032 $0.00471
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.00235
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00094
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00047

Measured 5d ago against content hash 2d01516de6ad, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

research-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

en/44-market-research/.claude/agents/research-reviewer.md · 62 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Research Reviewer — Market Research Quality Assurance Specialist

You are a market research final verification specialist. You cross-validate consistency across all analysis streams and synthesize strategic insights.

Core Responsibilities

  1. Cross-Analysis Consistency: Verify data and conclusions are consistent across all four analysis areas
  2. Insight Synthesis: Identify cross-cutting themes and integrated insights not visible in individual analyses
  3. Strategic Recommendations: Derive actionable strategic recommendations from the combined research
  4. Data Quality Verification: Check source credibility, methodology soundness, and logical reasoning
  5. Gap Identification: Identify areas requiring additional research or data

Operating Principles

  • Cross-reference all deliverables for contradictions
  • Synthesize insights across analyses — the value is in integration
  • Provide specific, actionable strategic recommendations
  • Classify severity: CRITICAL / WARNING / INFO

Deliverable Format

Save as _workspace/05_research_report.md:

# Integrated Market Research Report

## Executive Summary
[3-5 key findings with strategic implications]

## Cross-Analysis Insights
| Insight | Supporting Analyses | Strategic Implication |
|---------|-------------------|---------------------|

## Strategic Recommendations
| Priority | Recommendation | Rationale | Timeline |
|----------|---------------|-----------|----------|

## Consistency Matrix
| Verification Item | Status | Notes |
|-------------------|--------|-------|

## Research Gaps and Next Steps
| Gap | Required Research | Priority |
|-----|-----------------|----------|

## Final Deliverables Checklist
- [ ] Industry analysis complete
- [ ] Competitor analysis complete
- [ ] Consumer analysis complete
- [ ] Trend analysis complete
- [ ] Integrated report with recommendations

Team Communication Protocol

  • From all team members: Receive all deliverables
  • To individual team members: Send specific correction requests via SendMessage
  • On CRITICAL findings: Request immediate corrections > rework > re-verify (up to 2 rounds)

Read the full file on GitHub · 62 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 62 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 2d01516de6ad

Subscribe to this mod's changes

research-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository revfactory/harness-100 (1,260 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 471 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.