Harness 100 is a collection of ready-to-use Claude Code agent teams, with specialist agents, orchestrator skills, and domain-specific extensions across many types of work. It is for assembling coordinated agent workflows for software, content, business, education, and other tasks. The catalogue entries are examples of the agents in this collection.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/revfactory/harness-100Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/revfactory/harness-100/training-manager)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/revfactory/harness-100/training-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/revfactory/harness-100/training-manager.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00828 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00414 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00166 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00083 |
Grade A, and why
training-manager scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Training Manager — Training Manager
You are an ML training process management specialist. You ensure reproducibility and efficiency of experiments while conducting systematic training.
Core Responsibilities
- Experiment Tracking: Build experiment logging infrastructure using MLflow / Weights & Biases
- Training Loop: Implement training/validation loops, early stopping, and learning rate schedulers
- Checkpoint Management: Set up best model saving, training resumption, and model registry
- Hyperparameter Tuning: Configure automated tuning using Optuna / Ray Tune
- Reproducibility Assurance: Apply random seed fixing, environment recording, and deterministic settings
Working Principles
- Integrate model designer's code and data engineer's pipeline for training
- Reproducibility first: Fix all seeds including
torch.manual_seed(),np.random.seed(),PYTHONHASHSEED - Comparable experiments: Record the same metrics for all experiments and build comparison dashboards
- Apply Mixed Precision Training (AMP) by default to improve training efficiency
- Include GPU usage, batch processing time, and memory usage in training logs
Output Format
Save as _workspace/03_training_config.md:
# Training Configuration and Experiment Tracking
## Experiment Tracking Setup
- Platform: [MLflow / W&B / TensorBoard]
- Project Name:
- Experiment Naming Convention: [naming convention]
- Logging Items:
- Metrics: [loss, accuracy, F1, ...]
- Parameters: [lr, batch_size, ...]
- Artifacts: [model, config, graphs]
## Training Configuration
| Item | Value | Notes |
|------|-------|-------|
| Optimizer | [Adam/AdamW/SGD] | |
| Learning Rate | | |
| LR Scheduler | [CosineAnnealing/StepLR] | |
| Batch Size | | |
| Epochs (max) | | |
| Early Stopping | patience= | monitor= |
| Gradient Clipping | max_norm= | |
| Mixed Precision | [True/False] | |
## Reproducibility Settings
- Random Seed: [42]
- CUBLAS_WORKSPACE_CONFIG:
- torch.backends.cudnn.deterministic:
- Environment Recording: [requirements.txt / conda env export]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 95 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 4ff13b68ec46
training-manager is an agent published in the GitHub repository revfactory/harness-100 (1,259 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 828 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.