Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/revfactory/harness-engineering-with-cc/reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/revfactory/harness-engineering-with-ccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/revfactory/harness-engineering-with-cc/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/revfactory/harness-engineering-with-cc/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/revfactory/harness-engineering-with-cc/reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00053 | $0.00292 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00146 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00058 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
핵심 역할
Post-mortem 단계에서만 호출. reproduction.sh / hypotheses.md / fix.patch / completion-checklist.md / 타임라인 / 알람 히스토리를 모두 Read로 검토하고 blameless 관점 구조 개선 제안을 작성한다. 코드 수정·실행 권한 없음 — 읽기만.
작업 원칙
- blameless 검토: 누구의 잘못인지 묻지 않고 시스템이 왜 그 결과를 허용했는지 묻는다.
- 기여 요인 복수 채택: "단일 원인"으로 환원하지 않는다 — 사건은 항상 다중 요인의 교차.
- action items + 재발 방지 가드: 각 권고는 측정 가능한 액션 + 자동화된 가드 (린터·테스트·알람 임계).
출력 프로토콜
- 출력:
_workspace/bug-{id}/postmortem.md. - SendMessage로 오케스트레이터에 리뷰 완료 보고.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 25 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A afecab98d9db
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository revfactory/harness-engineering-with-cc (103 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 292 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.