null-safety-scanner

null-safety-scanner is an agent for Claude Code from ReviewToolkits/cext-review-toolkit. It costs 82 tokens per session (2,594 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review agent for finding possible NULL pointer dereferences in C extensions that use Python’s C API. A NULL pointer is an empty or invalid result that can cause a program to crash if used carelessly.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit C extension code, review unchecked allocations, and examine cases where Python/C API calls may return NULL.
Why use it?
It helps locate missing checks around allocations and API calls before they lead to segmentation faults.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the cext-review-toolkit plugin — 1 skill, 4 commands, 14 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to audit C extension code, review unchecked allocations, and examine cases where Python/C API calls may return NULL.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/null-safety-scanner
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ReviewToolkits/cext-review-toolkit

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install cext-review-toolkit, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill, 4 commands, 14 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for null-safety-scanner

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/null-safety-scanner.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/null-safety-scanner)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/null-safety-scanner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/null-safety-scanner.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 82 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,594 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00082 $0.02594
Opus 5 $0.00041 $0.01297
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.00519
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00259

Measured 8d ago against content hash b7811b520563, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

null-safety-scanner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/cext-review-toolkit/agents/null-safety-scanner.md · 177 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 177 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are an expert in NULL pointer safety in C extension code that uses the Python/C API. Your goal is to find NULL pointer dereference risks -- unchecked allocations, dereferences before checks, and missing checks on APIs that return NULL for non-error conditions -- in extension modules.

Preflight Orientation (read first)

If reports/<extension>_v1/preflight/generated_code_map.md exists, read it before Phase 1. The generated-code-mapper has already classified files (hand-written vs generator-emitted), catalogued ACCEPTABLE generator-runtime idioms with grep regexes, and surfaced project-specific patterns that flip finding classifications. Apply its orientation to:

  • Skip generator-emitted files unless the mapper escalated specific lines
  • Filter findings matching the mapper's ACCEPTABLE-idiom regexes
  • Use project-specific patterns to flip classifications (e.g., uvloop's RAII context-object dismisses Q2 "no Release in this function" findings)
  • Cross-reference any Q1–Q5 finding IDs the mapper triaged

If no preflight exists, proceed normally.

Key Concepts

NULL pointer dereferences in C extensions cause immediate segfaults (crashes). They arise from:

  • Unchecked allocations: PyObject_New, PyMem_Malloc, PyObject_CallObject, etc., can return NULL on out-of-memory. Using the result without a check is a crash.
  • Dereference before check: Code that accesses a pointer and only checks for NULL afterward. The check is dead code since the crash already happened.
  • APIs that return NULL for non-error conditions: PyDict_GetItem returns NULL both for missing keys and on error. PyObject_GetAttrString returns NULL if the attribute does not exist. Code must handle the NULL-means-not-found case explicitly.
  • Unchecked argument parsing: PyArg_ParseTuple can fail and leave output pointers uninitialized; using them without checking the return value is dangerous.

Analysis Phases

Phase 1: Automated Scan and Triage

Run the NULL safety scanner:

Read the full file on GitHub · 177 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 177 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b7811b520563

Subscribe to this mod's changes

null-safety-scanner is an agent published in the GitHub repository ReviewToolkits/cext-review-toolkit (28 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 2,594 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

reviewer

Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…

genkovich/sdd · 81 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens

bt6-pr-auditor

Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.

elder-plinius/T3MP3ST · 32 tokens

Reviewer

Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.

monkilabs/opencastle · 30 tokens

security-auditor

Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit · 40 tokens

reviewer-architecture

Use this agent for architecture-focused code review. Evaluates implementation against the plan's architectural decisions, checks separation of concerns, pattern consistency, and proper use of existing abstractions. Spawned in parallel with other reviewers when a review task is dispatched.

HirogaKatageri/hirokata · 56 tokens