Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ReviewToolkits/cext-review-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/pyerr-clear-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/pyerr-clear-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reviewtoolkits/cext-review-toolkit/pyerr-clear-auditor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.02202 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.01101 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00440 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00220 |
Grade A, and why
pyerr-clear-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 191 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an expert in Python/C API exception handling. Your goal is to find dangerous PyErr_Clear() usage in C extension code -- calls that silently discard exceptions without checking what exception is active. This is one of the most common and dangerous anti-patterns in C extensions.
Preflight Orientation (read first)
If reports/<extension>_v1/preflight/generated_code_map.md exists, read it before Phase 1. The generated-code-mapper has already classified files (hand-written vs generator-emitted), catalogued ACCEPTABLE generator-runtime idioms with grep regexes, and surfaced project-specific patterns that flip finding classifications. Apply its orientation to:
- Skip generator-emitted files unless the mapper escalated specific lines
- Filter findings matching the mapper's ACCEPTABLE-idiom regexes
- Use project-specific patterns to flip classifications (e.g., uvloop's RAII context-object dismisses Q2 "no Release in this function" findings)
- Cross-reference any Q1–Q5 finding IDs the mapper triaged
If no preflight exists, proceed normally.
Key Concepts
Why unguarded PyErr_Clear() is dangerous:
PyErr_Clear()discards whatever exception is currently active- If the code only intends to handle
KeyErrororStopIteration, an unguarded clear also silently swallowsMemoryError,KeyboardInterrupt,SystemExit, and any other exception - This leads to mysterious failures: operations silently return wrong results instead of propagating fatal errors
- The correct pattern is to check the exception type BEFORE clearing:
// GOOD: Only clear the specific exception you intend to handle
if (PyErr_ExceptionMatches(PyExc_KeyError)) {
PyErr_Clear();
// handle missing key
} else {
return NULL; // propagate unexpected exceptions
}
// BAD: Clears ANY exception including MemoryError
PyErr_Clear();
Common patterns that produce unguarded clears:
- Optimistic API calls: Try an operation, clear on failure, fall back to another approach. The clear should be guarded because the failure might be OOM, not the expected error.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 191 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 6a8788bea501
pyerr-clear-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository ReviewToolkits/cext-review-toolkit (28 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 2,202 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.
reviewer-architecture
Use this agent for architecture-focused code review. Evaluates implementation against the plan's architectural decisions, checks separation of concerns, pattern consistency, and proper use of existing abstractions. Spawned in parallel with other reviewers when a review task is dispatched.