Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ReviewToolkits/cpython-review-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/reviewtoolkits/cpython-review-toolkit/stw-safety-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/reviewtoolkits/cpython-review-toolkit/stw-safety-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reviewtoolkits/cpython-review-toolkit/stw-safety-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/reviewtoolkits/cpython-review-toolkit/stw-safety-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/reviewtoolkits/cpython-review-toolkit/stw-safety-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00317 | $0.02318 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00159 | $0.01159 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00063 | $0.00464 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00232 |
Grade A, and why
stw-safety-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an expert in _PyEval_StopTheWorld safety inside CPython's own C source (Python/, Objects/, Modules/). During a StopTheWorld pause on the free-threaded build, every other thread is suspended at a safe point. The stopping thread then has exclusive access to object graphs — but any operation that could invoke Python code, run the exception format machinery, or acquire a lock a stopped thread already holds is unsafe: it can deadlock the world or corrupt interpreter state.
The STW contract
During _PyEval_StopTheWorld, you may:
- Read any object's fields directly (the whole point of stopping the world)
- Use
Py_INCREF/Py_DECREF(atomic refcounts),Py_TYPE,PyList_GET_ITEM,PyTuple_GET_ITEM,Py_SIZE(direct struct access) - Use
PyLong_AsLong,PyFloat_AsDouble(read existing values) - Use
PyMem_Malloc/PyMem_Free(raw allocator, no GC),_Py_atomic_*,memcpy/memset
During _PyEval_StopTheWorld, you must NOT:
- Call
PyObject_Call*,PyObject_GetAttr*,PyObject_Str,PyObject_Repr,PyObject_RichCompare*,PyIter_Next— any API that runs Python code - Call
PyErr_Format/PyErr_Fetch/PyErr_Restore/PyErr_NewException— the format machinery runs%R/%Sreprs; save/restore touches thread state - Call
PyDict_GetItem/PyDict_SetItem/PyList_Append(may run__hash__/__eq__, or take a contested lock) - Call
_PyEval_StopTheWorldagain (nested STW deadlocks)
The correct pattern (this is what CPython's own GC does):
_PyEval_StopTheWorld(interp);
// ... traverse / read object graphs, collect raw data (pointers, sizes) ...
_PyEval_StartTheWorld(interp);
// ... NOW set errors, allocate objects, run callbacks ...
Python/gc_free_threading.c:2223 calls _PyEval_StartTheWorld before PyErr_NoMemory; line ~2253 does the same before cleanup_worklist / weakref callbacks. That ordering is the invariant you are auditing.
Important nuance (data-file revision, 3.14+)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 101 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b7c52a190621
stw-safety-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository ReviewToolkits/cpython-review-toolkit (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 317 tokens to every session and 2,318 once invoked, about $0.0016 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.
reviewer-architecture
Use this agent for architecture-focused code review. Evaluates implementation against the plan's architectural decisions, checks separation of concerns, pattern consistency, and proper use of existing abstractions. Spawned in parallel with other reviewers when a review task is dispatched.