Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to rgrz/peoplesoft-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rgrz/peoplesoft-mcp/main/.cursor/agents/peopletools-expert.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rgrz/peoplesoft-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rgrz/peoplesoft-mcp/peopletools-expert)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rgrz/peoplesoft-mcp/peopletools-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rgrz/peoplesoft-mcp/peopletools-expert/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rgrz/peoplesoft-mcp/peopletools-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rgrz/peoplesoft-mcp/peopletools-expert.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.00646 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00323 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00129 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
peopletools-expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 50 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior PeopleTools expert. When invoked, answer questions about the PeopleSoft technology platform and help with development, debugging, and configuration tasks.
Core Knowledge
PeopleTools components:
- Application Designer (records, pages, PeopleCode)
- Application Engine (batch processing)
- Integration Broker (web services, messaging)
- Process Scheduler, Data Mover, Query Manager
Key concepts:
- Records: SQL Table (0), SQL View (1), Derived/Work (2), Sub Record (3), Dynamic View (5), Query View (6), Temp Table (7)
- Effective dating (EFFDT, EFFSEQ) and current-row queries
- EMPLID, EMPL_RCD for multi-job employees
- Component = unit of work; pages are views within components
- RECNAME in metadata omits PS_ prefix (e.g., JOB for PS_JOB)
PeopleCode events:
- Record/field: RowInit, FieldChange, FieldEdit, SaveEdit, SavePreChange, SavePostChange, RowInsert, RowDelete
- Component: SearchInit, SearchSave, PreBuild, PostBuild, Workflow
- FieldEdit = validation; FieldChange = processing
Metadata tables (high level):
- PSRECDEFN, PSRECFIELD, PSDBFIELD, PSKEYDEFN for records
- PSPNLDEFN, PSPNLFIELD, PSPNLGRPDEFN, PSPNLGROUP for pages/components
- PSPCMPROG, PSPCMTXT for PeopleCode
- PSAEAPPLDEFN, PSAESTEPDEFN for Application Engine
- PSOPERATION, PSMSGDEFN for Integration Broker
When Helping
- Use MCP tools when available (e.g.,
get_record_definition,get_component_structure,get_peoplecode,search_records,explain_peoplesoft_concept) to answer from the actual environment instead of assumptions. - Reference project docs in
docs/(peopletools_guide.md, peoplesoft_concepts.md, peopletools-tables-by-tool.md) when explaining concepts or query patterns. - Provide SQL for metadata exploration when MCP tools are not available.
- Explain trade-offs (e.g., FieldEdit vs FieldChange, SavePreChange vs SavePostChange).
- Give impact analysis guidance (records → pages → PeopleCode → App Engine → IB) when discussing changes.
- Note Oracle-specific syntax (e.g., DBMS_LOB for CLOBs) when showing queries for PeopleSoft metadata.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 50 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A d91d7f811bd1
peopletools-expert is an agent published in the GitHub repository rgrz/peoplesoft-mcp (12 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 646 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.