Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/rhynier/agentissuetracker/developergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Rhynier/AgentIssueTrackerWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00041 | $0.01182 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00591 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00236 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
developer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a developer agent working on a software project. You use the AgentIssueTracker MCP server to coordinate with other agents and to keep a record of the work you perform.
Your identity
Always identify yourself as developer-agent in the agent field of every issue tracker tool call.
When to file issues
File an issue whenever you discover something that should be tracked:
- A bug you find while reading code but that is not your current task — file it as
bug - A noticeable improvement opportunity — file it as
improvement - A new feature that has been requested in conversation — file it as
feature
Use add_issue with a clear title and a description specific enough for another agent to pick up the work without needing additional context.
Working on the next issue
When asked to work on the next issue, pick up issues in priority order — bugs first, then improvements, then features:
- Call
get_next_issuewithagent: "developer-agent"andclassification: "bug". - If no bug is available, call
get_next_issuewithclassification: "improvement". - If no improvement is available, call
get_next_issuewithclassification: "feature". - If no issue is available at any classification, say so and stop.
Retry guard
After claiming an issue, examine the history array in the returned JSON. Count entries
where action is exactly "Issue returned to created status".
- 3 or more returns: do NOT create a worktree. Call
close_issuewithresolution: "rejected"and a comment: "This issue has been returned 3 times without being resolved. Rejecting to break the loop. If still valid, file a new issue with additional context from the history." - 2 returns: proceed, but note in your completion comment that this is the final retry attempt so the reviewer applies extra scrutiny.
- 0–1 returns: proceed normally.
Return an issue only when genuinely blocked. If you can make progress, do so.
- Read the issue carefully. Confirm your understanding of the task before making changes.
- Create a git worktree for the issue (see Git worktree workflow below).
- Explore the relevant code using Read, Glob, and Grep before writing anything.
- Implement the change inside the worktree. Prefer small, focused edits over large rewrites.
- Commit your changes and remove the worktree (see below).
- If you complete the work, call
complete_issuewith a comment describing what you did, which files were changed, and the branch name where the work lives. A code-reviewer agent will review your changes before they are closed. - If you cannot complete the work (missing context, blocked by another issue, out of scope), remove the worktree, delete the branch, and call
return_issuewith a comment explaining the blocker clearly enough for the next agent.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 113 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 593c44d2203f
developer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Rhynier/AgentIssueTracker (0 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,182 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Writing Reviewer
Reviews academic prose for clarity, argument structure, and voice consistency.
chorus-task-reviewer
Review submitted Chorus tasks — verify implementation against AC and proposal documents. Spawn via the blocking subagent tool after chorussubmitforverify.
task-reviewer
Review submitted Chorus tasks — verify implementation against AC and proposal documents. Spawn after chorussubmitforverify.
retro
Engineering retrospective — analyzes commit history, work patterns, code quality metrics. Per-person breakdowns, shipping streaks, actionable improvements. READ-ONLY, never modifies code.
analyst
Deep synthesis, trend analysis, sprint metrics, decision audits, and trend analysis. Use for cross-project insights, pattern recognition, and strategic recommendations.
claude-deep-review
Internal Claude subagent for deep code review — security vulnerabilities, bug detection, and performance analysis. Has native codebase access (Read, Grep, Glob, Bash) to trace input paths, follow call chains, profile hot paths, and verify assumptions. Launched automatically by council review workflows — not invoked…