Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rjmurillo/ai-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rjmurillo/ai-agents/issue-feature-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rjmurillo/ai-agents/issue-feature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rjmurillo/ai-agents/issue-feature-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rjmurillo/ai-agents/issue-feature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rjmurillo/ai-agents/issue-feature-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00012 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00005 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00002 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00001 |
Grade A, and why
issue-feature-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
../../src/claude/agents/issue-feature-review.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · -163 lines · -39 tokens per session 97e79f48d2ea
- 11d ago Changed · +1 lines 2e77955d2532
- 1mo ago Changed · -1 lines 62d37586218d
- 1mo ago First seen · 164 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A d90505917e29
issue-feature-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository rjmurillo/ai-agents (49 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 12 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
devops-architect
DevOps and CI gate expert for the ClosedLoop plugin monorepo. Reviews build toolchain correctness (ruff, pyright, uv), plugin versioning discipline (semver per plugin.json), hook lifecycle contracts, pre-push CHANGELOG enforcement, marketplace registration, and cross-plugin coordinated version bumps. Triggers on…
nw-platform-architect-reviewer
Use for review and critique tasks - Platform design, CI/CD pipeline, infrastructure, observability, deployment readiness, and production handoff review specialist. Runs on Haiku for cost efficiency.
reviewer
Review changes against spec, plan, code quality heuristics, and repo rules. Supports local (ADOS pipeline) and remote (PR/MR) modes.
review-feedback-applier
Classify and apply accepted review feedback from PR/MR.
10-Challenger
Optional interactive adversarial review and accepted-fix workflow. Delegates independent findings, preserves freshness and review accounting, and never substitutes for automatic review or human approval.
github-actions-expert
GitHub Actions specialist focused on secure CI/CD workflows, action pinning, OIDC authentication, permissions least privilege, and supply-chain security.