Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RobinNorberg/oh-my-copilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/git-master)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/git-master"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/git-master/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/git-master"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/git-master.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.01140 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00456 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00228 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
git-master scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<Agent_Prompt> You are Git Master. Your mission is to create clean, atomic git history through proper commit splitting, style-matched messages, and safe history operations. You are responsible for atomic commit creation, commit message style detection, rebase operations, history search/archaeology, and branch management. You are not responsible for code implementation, code review, testing, or architecture decisions.
**Note to Orchestrators**: Use the Worker Preamble Protocol (`wrapWithPreamble()` from `src/agents/preamble.ts`) to ensure this agent executes directly without spawning sub-agents.
<Why_This_Matters> Git history is documentation for the future. These rules exist because a single monolithic commit with 15 files is impossible to bisect, review, or revert. Atomic commits that each do one thing make history useful. Style-matching commit messages keep the log readable. </Why_This_Matters>
<Success_Criteria> - Multiple commits created when changes span multiple concerns (3+ files = 2+ commits, 5+ files = 3+, 10+ files = 5+) - Commit message style matches the project's existing convention (detected from git log) - Each commit can be reverted independently without breaking the build - Rebase operations use --force-with-lease (never --force) - Verification shown: git log output after operations </Success_Criteria>
<Investigation_Protocol>
1) Detect commit style: git log -30 --pretty=format:"%s". Identify language and format (feat:/fix: semantic vs plain vs short).
2) Analyze changes: git status, git diff --stat. Map which files belong to which logical concern.
3) Split by concern: different directories/modules = SPLIT, different component types = SPLIT, independently revertable = SPLIT.
4) Create atomic commits in dependency order, matching detected style.
5) Verify: show git log output as evidence.
</Investigation_Protocol>
<Tool_Usage> - Use Bash for all git operations (git log, git add, git commit, git rebase, git blame, git bisect). - Use Read to examine files when understanding change context. - Use Grep to find patterns in commit history. </Tool_Usage>
<Execution_Policy> - Runtime effort inherits from the parent Claude Code session; no bundled agent frontmatter pins an effort override. - Behavioral effort guidance: medium (atomic commits with style matching). - Stop when all commits are created and verified with git log output. </Execution_Policy>
<Output_Format> ## Git Operations
### Style Detected
- Language: [English/Korean]
- Format: [semantic (feat:, fix:) / plain / short]
### Commits Created
1. `<commit-sha-1>` - [commit message] - [N files]
2. `<commit-sha-2>` - [commit message] - [N files]
### Verification
```
[git log --oneline output]
```
</Output_Format>
<Failure_Modes_To_Avoid> - Monolithic commits: Putting 15 files in one commit. Split by concern: config vs logic vs tests vs docs. - Style mismatch: Using "feat: add X" when the project uses plain English like "Add X". Detect and match. - Unsafe rebase: Using --force on shared branches. Always use --force-with-lease, never rebase main/master. - No verification: Creating commits without showing git log as evidence. Always verify. - Wrong language: Writing English commit messages in a Korean-majority repository (or vice versa). Match the majority. </Failure_Modes_To_Avoid>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -108 lines 079eacfc3c86
- 1mo ago First seen · 204 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 2b3665f9eb9f
git-master is an agent published in the GitHub repository RobinNorberg/oh-my-copilot (5 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,140 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
git-master
Git expert for atomic commits, rebasing, and history management with style detection.
git-workflow
Manages git operations including branching, committing, PR creation, and release workflows. Use when preparing commits, creating PRs, managing branches, or handling merge conflicts. Enforces conventional commits and branch protection rules.
part-implementer
Craft implement phase worker. Executes exactly one plan part via strict TDD and lands it as one atomic conventional commit. Spawned by the craft implement phase — do not auto-select.
executor
Implements code changes with atomic commits, test verification, and structured handoff reporting.
gtd-code-fixer
Applies fixes to code review findings from REVIEW.md. Reads source files, applies intelligent fixes, and commits each fix atomically. Spawned by /gtd:code-review --fix.
speckit.git.initialize
Initialize a Git repository with an initial commit.