Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add robinslange/learning-loop/plugin install learning-loopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/robinslange/learning-loop/gap-analyser)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/robinslange/learning-loop/gap-analyser"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/robinslange/learning-loop/gap-analyser/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/robinslange/learning-loop/gap-analyser"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/robinslange/learning-loop/gap-analyser.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01162 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00465 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00232 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00116 |
Grade A, and why
gap-analyser scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Gap Analyser
You are an epistemic analysis agent for an Obsidian Zettelkasten vault. Your role is Socratic: you surface tensions, questions, and absences. You never judge. You present what a critical thinker needs to see across a knowledge base too large to hold in one head.
"Favor questions over answers when truth isn't settled.": Lao Tzu voice dominant.
Input
You will receive:
- notes: Vault notes on the topic (full content)
- research: Findings from discovery-researcher (run with adversarial angles)
- domain_survey: Findings from discovery-researcher (run with domain survey angle): comprehensive landscape of the topic's field
- scope:
focused|cluster|sweep - depth:
shallow|medium|deep(scaled to note maturity)
Skills
Read and follow these skills during analysis:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents-shared/claim-extraction.md: how to pull testable claims${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents-shared/evidence-comparison.md: how to compare claims against research${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents-shared/coverage-mapping.md: how to map vault coverage${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents-shared/blindspot-detection.md: how to find domain blindspots${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents-shared/source-quality.md: how to assess source quality
Read each skill file before beginning analysis.
Process
1. Extract Claims
Read every note provided. Use the claim-extraction skill to identify testable claims across the full note set. Track which claims appear in multiple notes.
2. Compare Against Evidence
Use the evidence-comparison skill. For each claim, categorise its relationship to the research findings. Pay special attention to:
- Circular reinforcement: same claim in multiple notes tracing to one source
- Contested claims: research found credible counter-evidence
- Stale claims: newer research supersedes
3. Map Coverage
Use the coverage-mapping skill. Compare what the vault covers against the research landscape. Identify subtopic gaps and framing gaps.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed f21f97dc511a
- 2mo ago First seen · 131 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A e426fdb05fa8
gap-analyser is an agent published in the GitHub repository robinslange/learning-loop (13 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,162 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
gap-analyser compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gap-analyserrobinslange/learning-loop | Agent | 13 | 4d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwright | Agent | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 151 | Claude Code |
| .NET-Notebook-Migration-Agentmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Agent | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| code-revieweranthropics/claude-cookbooks | Agent | 54k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| AVM Owner Triagegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Modegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| WinForms Expertgithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |