epo-patent-analyzer

epo-patent-analyzer is an agent for Claude Code from RobThePCGuy/Claude-Patent-Creator. It costs 46 tokens per session (1,103 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An automated reviewer for European patent applications under the European Patent Convention, the rulebook used by the European Patent Office. It examines claims, disclosure sufficiency, formal requirements, excluded subject matter, and inventive step.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for complete application reviews, pre-filing quality checks, checking whether the invention is explained sufficiently, converting US applications to EPO format, and preparing responses to EPO examination communications.
Why use it?
It brings several EPO checks together so potential filing and examination issues can be found in one review.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the claude-patent-creator-standalone plugin — 17 skills, 16 commands, 13 agents, 2 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it for complete application reviews, pre-filing quality checks, checking whether the invention is explained sufficiently, converting US applications to EPO format, and preparing responses to EPO examination communications.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/epo-patent-analyzer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RobThePCGuy/Claude-Patent-Creator

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install claude-patent-creator-standalone, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 17 skills, 16 commands, 13 agents, 2 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for epo-patent-analyzer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/epo-patent-analyzer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/epo-patent-analyzer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/epo-patent-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/epo-patent-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for epo-patent-analyzer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/epo-patent-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/epo-patent-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 46 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,103 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00046 $0.01103
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00551
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00221
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00110

Measured 10d ago against content hash 4a0edfb938a7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

epo-patent-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

agents/epo-patent-analyzer.md · 139 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

EPO Patent Analyzer

Expert system for analyzing patent applications for European Patent Office compliance under the EPC.

Expertise

  • Art. 84 EPC claims clarity, conciseness, and support
  • Art. 83 EPC sufficiency of disclosure
  • Rules 42-49 EPC formalities requirements
  • Rule 43 EPC two-part form and claim structure
  • Art. 52(2) EPC excluded subject matter
  • Art. 53 EPC exceptions to patentability
  • Art. 56 EPC inventive step (problem-solution approach)
  • EPO Guidelines Parts A, F, and G

When to Use This Agent

Use this agent when:

  • Reviewing complete EP patent applications
  • Checking claims for Art. 84 EPC compliance
  • Validating sufficiency of disclosure (Art. 83)
  • Verifying EPO formalities (Rules 42-49)
  • Pre-filing quality assurance for EPO
  • Converting USPTO applications to EPO format
  • Responding to EPO examination communications

Analysis Capabilities

Claims Analysis (Art. 84 EPC)

  • Clarity: objective, unambiguous claim language
  • Conciseness: no redundant or overlapping claims
  • Support by description: claims within disclosure scope
  • Two-part form (Rule 43(1)): preamble + characterised in that
  • Claim categories: product, process, apparatus, use
  • Excluded subject matter: Art. 52(2), Art. 53 EPC
  • Functional features: must be clearly verifiable
  • Reference signs: correspond to description and drawings

Sufficiency Analysis (Art. 83 EPC)

  • Reproducibility by person skilled in the art
  • Breadth of claims vs scope of disclosure
  • Essential features identified and described
  • Working examples and embodiments
  • Undue burden assessment
  • Plausibility of claimed effects

Formalities Checking (Rules 42-49 EPC)

  • Description sections (Rule 42): correct order and content
  • Claims form (Rule 43): two-part, numbering, categories
  • Drawings (Rule 46): margins, no text, reference signs
  • Abstract (Rule 47): max 150 words, figure designation
  • Physical requirements: A4, margins, fonts
  • Fee calculations: claims > 15, pages > 35

Tools Available

Read the full file on GitHub · 139 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 139 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 4a0edfb938a7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

epo-patent-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository RobThePCGuy/Claude-Patent-Creator (180 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 1,103 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

edtech-reviewer

Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…

avelikiy/great_cto · 112 tokens

voice-ai-reviewer

Voice-AI / telephony pre-implementation reviewer. Specialises in TCPA prior-express-consent, STIR/SHAKEN attestation, state recording-consent matrix (one-/two-party), CRTC CASL (Canada), Ofcom CLI rules (UK), EU AI Act Article 50 synth-voice disclosure, deepfake laws (CA AB-2655, TN ELVIS Act), and PII redaction in…

avelikiy/great_cto · 121 tokens

adtech-privacy-reviewer

US adtech / web-tracking privacy-litigation pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-adtech-{slug}.md and signs off the tracking-consent gate before senior-dev claims tasks.

avelikiy/great_cto · 46 tokens

healthcare-reviewer

Healthcare-specific pre-implementation reviewer for archetype:healthcare. Specialises in HIPAA Security Rule (45 CFR 164.308–318), Business Associate Agreement (BAA) chain, FHIR/HL7 implementation gotchas, PHI access logging (immutable audit), HITECH breach-notification timelines, and HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR)…

avelikiy/great_cto · 103 tokens

agent-reviewer

Use this agent when reviewing agent code for quality and best practices. Examples: Context: User has written an agent and wants feedback user: "Review my agent code for best practices" assistant: "I'll use the agent-reviewer to analyze your code for idempotence, isolation, security, and architecture patterns." User…

comet-ml/opik-claude-code-plugin · 225 tokens

privacy-reviewer

Use before /app-ship on flagship work for the privacy pass — data inventory, consent, retention, third-party sharing, and regional compliance. Distinct evidence set from security. On utility projects this is not a role at all — security-reviewer runs it as its privacy MODE against the same checklist.

vmobifystudio/app-dev-team · 65 tokens