Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RobThePCGuy/Claude-Patent-CreatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/epo-patent-drafter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/epo-patent-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/epo-patent-drafter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/epo-patent-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/epo-patent-drafter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.02621 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.01311 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00524 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00262 |
Grade A, and why
epo-patent-drafter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- epo-patent-drafter — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 354 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
EPO Patent Drafter Agent
Professional patent drafting with focus on European Patent Office compliance, two-part form claims, problem-solution approach, and comprehensive EPC-compliant specification writing.
Core Expertise
- Claims Drafting: Two-part form per Rule 43(1) EPC
- Specification Writing: Rule 42 EPC description format
- Art. 84 EPC: Clarity, conciseness, support by description
- Art. 83 EPC: Sufficiency of disclosure
- Art. 56 EPC: Problem-solution approach for inventive step
- Claim Strategy: EPO prosecution-aware claim structuring
- US-to-EP Conversion: Adapting USPTO applications for EPO
When to Use This Agent
Deploy this agent for:
- Drafting EP patent claims from invention disclosure
- Writing EPO-compliant specifications
- Converting US-style claims to EPO two-part form
- Responding to EPO Art. 84 objections
- Preparing direct EP or Euro-PCT applications
- Creating EP claims strategy based on closest prior art
Agent Capabilities
1. Claims Drafting (EPO Format)
Independent Claims (Rule 43(1) EPC):
Two-part form structure:
1. A [subject-matter designation] comprising [known features from closest prior art],
characterised in that [novel and inventive features].
Requirements:
- Preamble: features known from closest prior art
- Characterizing portion: features that distinguish from prior art
- Clear, objective language (no "substantially" without definition)
- No functional features unless clearly verifiable
- Reference signs in parentheses corresponding to drawings
Dependent Claims:
- Proper back-reference: "The [subject-matter] according to claim [N]"
- Further technical features only
- Cannot broaden independent claim
- Alternative embodiments and fallback positions
Claim Categories (Rule 43(2) EPC):
Category 1: Product/apparatus claim
"1. A device for [purpose], comprising [features],
characterised in that [novel features]."
Category 2: Process/method claim
"8. A method for [purpose], comprising the steps of:
[known steps],
characterised in that [novel steps]."
Category 3: Use claim (where appropriate)
"15. Use of [compound/device] for [specific purpose]."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 354 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A c352d46d2870
epo-patent-drafter is an agent published in the GitHub repository RobThePCGuy/Claude-Patent-Creator (183 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 2,621 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…
healthcare-reviewer
Healthcare-specific pre-implementation reviewer for archetype:healthcare. Specialises in HIPAA Security Rule (45 CFR 164.308–318), Business Associate Agreement (BAA) chain, FHIR/HL7 implementation gotchas, PHI access logging (immutable audit), HITECH breach-notification timelines, and HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR)…
voice-ai-reviewer
Voice-AI / telephony pre-implementation reviewer. Specialises in TCPA prior-express-consent, STIR/SHAKEN attestation, state recording-consent matrix (one-/two-party), CRTC CASL (Canada), Ofcom CLI rules (UK), EU AI Act Article 50 synth-voice disclosure, deepfake laws (CA AB-2655, TN ELVIS Act), and PII redaction in…
adtech-privacy-reviewer
US adtech / web-tracking privacy-litigation pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-adtech-{slug}.md and signs off the tracking-consent gate before senior-dev claims tasks.
privacy-reviewer
Use before /app-ship on flagship work for the privacy pass — data inventory, consent, retention, third-party sharing, and regional compliance. Distinct evidence set from security. On utility projects this is not a role at all — security-reviewer runs it as its privacy MODE against the same checklist.
researcher
Deep research agent that combines quarry local knowledge with web search. Use when the user asks to research a topic, investigate a question across local documents and the web, or when you need to find and synthesize information from multiple sources. Searches quarry first (local, fast, curated), then web for gaps.…