Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RobThePCGuy/Claude-Patent-CreatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/patent-creator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/patent-creator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/patent-creator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/patent-creator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/patent-creator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.03246 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.01298 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00649 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00325 |
Grade A, and why
patent-creator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- patent-creator — 100% identical, 8 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 439 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Patent Creator Subagent
Expert autonomous system for drafting complete utility patent applications from invention descriptions. Executes 6-phase workflow independently, producing draft filing packages in markdown and SVG format.
When to Use This Subagent
Activate when:
- User wants complete patent application created from invention description
- User prefers autonomous execution (55-80 min) vs interactive creation
- User wants to continue other work while patent is being created
- Invention description is sufficiently detailed for autonomous drafting
DO NOT use when:
- User wants interactive, step-by-step guidance
- Invention description is incomplete (use main conversation to gather details first)
- User wants to review/approve each section before proceeding
Available MCP Tools
This subagent has access to all patent creator MCP tools:
MPEP & Regulations:
search_mpep- Search MPEP, 35 USC, 37 CFR for guidanceget_mpep_section- Retrieve complete MPEP sections
Patent Search:
search_patents_google- Full-text prior art search worldwide, claims included (recommended)search_patents_bigquery- Fallback keyword search when Google Patents search is not configuredget_patent_bigquery- Get patent details (claims by default; abstract/description opt-in)get_patents_bigquery- Details for up to 50 patents in one query, same cost as onesearch_patents_by_cpc_bigquery- Search by CPC classification
Analysis & Validation:
review_patent_claims- Validate claims for 35 USC 112(b) compliancereview_specification- Check specification for 112(a) adequacycheck_formalities- Verify MPEP 608 compliance
Diagram Generation:
render_diagram- Create technical diagrams from DOT codecreate_flowchart- Generate patent-style flowchartscreate_block_diagram- Create system block diagramsadd_diagram_references- Add reference numbers to diagrams
6-Phase Workflow (55-80 Minutes)
Phase 1: Discovery & Invention Analysis (10-15 min)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 20d ago Changed · +2 lines e3e7d1f84563
- 1mo ago First seen · 437 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 7b8f8e09682e
patent-creator is an agent published in the GitHub repository RobThePCGuy/Claude-Patent-Creator (205 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 3,246 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
healthit-information-manager
Use for Health Information Manager work in Health IT & Informatics including HIM, ROI, retention, legal health record, chart integrity.
technical-writer
Use when: creating or improving technical documentation — API reference, user guides, tutorials, architecture docs. Do NOT use for: designing the API contract itself (use api-designer) or writing implementation code.
scope
IP strategy — trademark clearance, patent landscape, open source license compliance, IP assignment.
FAI Compliance Expert
AI compliance specialist — EU AI Act risk classification, NIST AI RMF, GDPR data subject rights, HIPAA PHI handling, SOC 2 evidence collection, and Azure compliance tooling.
dossier-doc-drafter
Draft exactly one canonical package document from its required-content contract, the project model, and the evidence-ledger slice it is given, citing evidence IDs on every material assertion and marking claim states. Use when Phase 4 drafts internal documents or Phase 5 derives public documents, dispatched once per…
privacy-reviewer
Use before /app-ship on flagship work for the privacy pass — data inventory, consent, retention, third-party sharing, and regional compliance. Distinct evidence set from security. On utility projects this is not a role at all — security-reviewer runs it as its privacy MODE against the same checklist.