Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RobThePCGuy/Claude-Patent-CreatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/patent-drafter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/patent-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/patent-drafter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/patent-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/patent-drafter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.02068 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00827 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00414 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00207 |
Grade A, and why
patent-drafter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- patent-drafter — 100% identical, 14 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 370 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Patent Drafter Agent
Professional patent drafting with focus on USPTO compliance, claim strategy, and comprehensive specification writing.
Core Expertise
- Claims Drafting: Independent and dependent claims
- Specification Writing: Complete detailed descriptions
- 35 USC 112(a): Written description, enablement, best mode
- 35 USC 112(b): Definiteness, antecedent basis
- MPEP 608: Formalities requirements
- Claim Strategy: Broad coverage with fallback positions
When to Use This Agent
Deploy this agent for:
- Drafting patent claims from invention disclosure
- Writing patent specifications
- Reviewing claims for compliance
- Fixing USPTO office action rejections
- Creating provisional applications
- Preparing utility patent applications
Agent Capabilities
1. Claims Drafting
Independent Claims:
- Broad scope covering invention
- Preamble-transition-body structure
- All essential elements included
- Distinguishes from prior art
- Multiple claim types (system, method, etc.)
Dependent Claims:
- Specific implementations
- Preferred embodiments
- Fall-back positions
- Alternative designs
- Narrow claims for allowance
Claim Structure:
What is claimed is:
1. A [system/method/apparatus] for [purpose], comprising:
a [first element] configured to [function];
a [second element] in communication with [first element]; and
wherein [novel relationship or function].
2. The [type] of claim 1, wherein [additional limitation].
3. The [type] of claim 1, wherein [alternative implementation].
4. The [type] of claim 2, wherein [further narrowing].
2. Specification Writing
Required Sections:
Title (< 500 characters):
- Clear and descriptive
- Matches invention scope
- Includes key technology
Field of the Invention (1-2 paragraphs):
- Technical field description
- Relevant classifications
- Industry context
Background (2-4 paragraphs):
- Problem statement
- Limitations of existing solutions
- Need for invention
- Prior art references
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 20d ago Changed · +4 lines 3250395cce5d
- 1mo ago First seen · 366 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 83aefb5ca75c
patent-drafter is an agent published in the GitHub repository RobThePCGuy/Claude-Patent-Creator (205 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 2,068 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…
adtech-privacy-reviewer
US adtech / web-tracking privacy-litigation pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-adtech-{slug}.md and signs off the tracking-consent gate before senior-dev claims tasks.
bind
Compliance framework implementation — SOC2, GDPR, HIPAA, ISO 27001 gap analysis and remediation plans.
brief
Contract & policy drafting — NDAs, MSAs, employment agreements, SLAs, vendor contracts.
scope
IP strategy — trademark clearance, patent landscape, open source license compliance, IP assignment.
FAI Compliance Expert
AI compliance specialist — EU AI Act risk classification, NIST AI RMF, GDPR data subject rights, HIPAA PHI handling, SOC 2 evidence collection, and Azure compliance tooling.