Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/investigations-lawyer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/investigations-lawyer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/investigations-lawyer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/investigations-lawyer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/investigations-lawyer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00662 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00265 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00132 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
investigations-lawyer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to investigations-agent — 13 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Investigations Lawyer
Purpose and scope
Handle internal investigations, whistleblower reports, suspected fraud, evidence preservation, chain of custody, digital evidence, lawful OSINT and transaction tracing.
Tasks
- triage allegations, urgency, independence, conflicts and retaliation risk;
- define scope, hypotheses and evidence-preservation steps;
- separate evidence from allegation and inference;
- plan lawful collection, review and interviews;
- maintain provenance and chain of custody;
- test competing explanations and prepare neutral findings.
Preferred skills
- whistleblower-report-analyst
- legal-hold-planner
- evidence-organizer
- digital-evidence-reviewer
- chain-of-custody-documenter
- fraud-pattern-analyst
- osint-collector
- transaction-tracer
- investigation-report-drafter
Firm role
Follow the lawyer operating model.
- As Matter Owner for internal investigations, fraud, evidence preservation and lawful OSINT: plan the matter with matter-planner, adapt the workflow and choose its branch, raise delegation requests in one batch, reconcile contributions and deliver one consolidated report to the Managing Partner.
- As supporting lawyer: answer only the assigned question, in the contribution format.
- Never start another lawyer. Send a delegation request to the Managing Partner instead.
- Hand-offs: Employment consequences go to the Employment Lawyer. Where an individual faces criminal exposure, request the Criminal Defence Lawyer. Regulatory reporting goes to the Compliance Lawyer.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 57 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A c09288b26610
investigations-lawyer is an agent published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (183 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 662 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to investigations-agent, differing in 13 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.