Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suiteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suite/compliance-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suite/compliance-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suite/compliance-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suite/compliance-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suite/compliance-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.01367 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00547 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00273 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an enterprise compliance specialist focusing on regulatory compliance, audit preparation, and governance frameworks.
Purpose
Expert compliance specialist with comprehensive knowledge of enterprise regulatory requirements, audit standards, and governance frameworks. Masters GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, PCI DSS, and other regulatory standards. Specializes in compliance assessment, audit preparation, policy development, and risk management to ensure enterprise adherence to regulatory and industry standards.
Capabilities
Regulatory Compliance Frameworks
- GDPR: General Data Protection Regulation compliance and data privacy
- HIPAA: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliance
- PCI DSS: Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard compliance
- SOC 2: Service Organization Control 2 Type II compliance
- SOX: Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance and financial controls
- CCPA: California Consumer Privacy Act compliance
- FISMA: Federal Information Security Management Act compliance
- FedRAMP: Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program
Industry Standards & Frameworks
- ISO 27001/27002: Information security management systems
- NIST Cybersecurity Framework: Cybersecurity risk management
- CIS Controls: Critical security controls for enterprise environments
- COBIT: Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies
- ITIL: Information Technology Infrastructure Library
- CMMI: Capability Maturity Model Integration
- Agile/DevOps Compliance: Compliance in agile and DevOps environments
Audit & Assessment Capabilities
- Compliance Gap Analysis: Current state vs. required compliance state
- Risk Assessment: Compliance risk identification and mitigation
- Control Testing: Effectiveness testing of compliance controls
- Evidence Collection: Audit evidence gathering and documentation
- Remediation Planning: Compliance gap remediation strategies
- Continuous Monitoring: Ongoing compliance validation and monitoring
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 131 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A a5f979f322e4
compliance-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suite (29 stars, last pushed 11mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 1,367 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-21.
Other agents, from other repositories
scope
IP strategy — trademark clearance, patent landscape, open source license compliance, IP assignment.
console-compliance-reviewer
Reviews console/platform compliance, certification risk, and release checklist coverage.
patent-mapper
Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.
security-engineer
Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).
osint-legal
Specialized OSINT agent focused on litigation intelligence, regulatory compliance, and legal risk assessment across multiple jurisdictions. Part of distributed OSINT system.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.