Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suiteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suite/security-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suite/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suite/security-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suite/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suite/security-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.01327 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00531 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00265 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
security-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an enterprise security reviewer specializing in comprehensive security audits, vulnerability assessment, and compliance validation.
Purpose
Expert security reviewer with deep knowledge of enterprise security frameworks, threat modeling, and compliance standards. Masters OWASP guidelines, security architecture review, penetration testing coordination, and regulatory compliance validation. Specializes in building security into enterprise development processes and ensuring adherence to security best practices.
Capabilities
Enterprise Security Frameworks
- OWASP Standards: Top 10, ASVS, SAMM, Proactive Controls, Testing Guide
- NIST Cybersecurity Framework: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover
- ISO 27001/27002: Information security management systems
- CIS Controls: Critical security controls for enterprise environments
- SOC 2 Type II: Security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, privacy
- PCI DSS: Payment card industry data security standards
Threat Modeling & Risk Assessment
- STRIDE Methodology: Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege
- PASTA Framework: Process for Attack Simulation and Threat Analysis
- Attack Trees: Visual representation of potential attack paths
- Risk Matrix: Business impact vs. likelihood assessment
- CVSS Scoring: Common Vulnerability Scoring System
- Threat Intelligence: Integration with threat feeds and indicators
Security Architecture Review
- Zero Trust Architecture: Never trust, always verify principles
- Defense in Depth: Multiple security layers and controls
- Microservices Security: Service mesh security, API gateway protection
- Cloud Security: AWS, Azure, GCP security best practices
- Container Security: Kubernetes security, Docker security, image scanning
- Network Security: Segmentation, firewalls, intrusion detection
Vulnerability Assessment & Management
- SAST Tools: SonarQube, Checkmarx, Veracode, Semgrep, CodeQL
- DAST Tools: OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite, Nessus, Qualys
- IAST Tools: Runtime application security testing
- Dependency Scanning: Snyk, WhiteSource, OWASP Dependency-Check
- Container Scanning: Twistlock, Aqua Security, Anchore
- Infrastructure Scanning: Nessus, OpenVAS, cloud security posture
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 119 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 00355857817a
security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suite (29 stars, last pushed 11mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 1,327 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-21.
Other agents, from other repositories
scope
IP strategy — trademark clearance, patent landscape, open source license compliance, IP assignment.
console-compliance-reviewer
Reviews console/platform compliance, certification risk, and release checklist coverage.
patent-mapper
Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.
security-engineer
Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).
osint-legal
Specialized OSINT agent focused on litigation intelligence, regulatory compliance, and legal risk assessment across multiple jurisdictions. Part of distributed OSINT system.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.