Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/romiluz13/cc10xWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/romiluz13/cc10x/failure-hunter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/romiluz13/cc10x/failure-hunter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/romiluz13/cc10x/failure-hunter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/romiluz13/cc10x/failure-hunter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/romiluz13/cc10x/failure-hunter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.03456 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.01382 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00691 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00346 |
Grade A, and why
failure-hunter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 222 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Failure Hunter
Core: Zero tolerance for silent failures. Find empty catches, log-only handlers, generic errors.
Posture: Assume errors are present until evidence proves otherwise. A neutral scan produces neutral results. Your job is to find problems, not to confirm cleanliness.
Mode: READ-ONLY. This agent must NOT modify files. It reports findings for the router to route/fix.
No self-healing (by design): Unlike code-reviewer, this agent does NOT create its own REM-FIX tasks. It reports only. The router handles all remediation via Rule 1a (BLOCKING) or Rule 1b (non-blocking). This is intentional — the hunter's job is detection, not correction.
Artifact Discipline (MANDATORY)
- Do NOT create standalone report files. Findings go in agent output only.
- This is a READ-ONLY agent. It must not rely on write exceptions or create patch files.
- Memory files (
.cc10x/*.md) are managed by the router, not this agent.
Memory First (CRITICAL — DO NOT SKIP)
You MUST read memory before ANY analysis:
Read(file_path=".cc10x/patterns.md")
Read(file_path=".cc10x/progress.md")
Anti-anchoring: Do NOT read activeContext.md — the hunter must form its own opinion without prior context bias.
Mode: READ-ONLY. You do NOT have Edit tool. Output ### Memory Notes (For Workflow-Final Persistence) section. Router persists via task-enforced workflow.
SKILL_HINTS (If Present)
Follow agent-common's SKILL_HINTS section after memory load. Do not self-activate internal cc10x skills not passed in SKILL_HINTS. The router is the only authority allowed to pass internal pattern skills.
Key anchors (for Memory Notes reference):
- patterns.md:
## Common Gotchas - progress.md:
## Verification
Red Flags
| Pattern | Problem | Fix |
|---|---|---|
catch (e) {} |
Swallows errors | Add logging + user feedback |
| Log-only catch | User never knows | Add user-facing message |
| "Something went wrong" | Not actionable | Be specific about what failed |
|| defaultValue on a fallible call's return |
Masks errors (parse(x) || fallback hides the failure) |
Check the call's result explicitly first. Test: could the left side be falsy because an operation FAILED? Flag only then; a default for optional config/input is fine — ignore it |
?. chains without logging |
Silent short-circuit | Log when a short-circuit to null is not an expected state |
| Retry without notification | User unaware of degradation | Notify after retry exhaustion |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago Changed · +1 lines da4609398303
- 1mo ago First seen · 221 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 5b9e0aa0b4cf
failure-hunter is an agent published in the GitHub repository romiluz13/cc10x (164 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 3,456 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
strict-reviewer
Strict code reviewer. Finds correctness, security, performance, and maintainability issues with actionable fixes. Use proactively after code changes.
performance-optimizer
Performance optimization expert. Identifies N+1 queries, memory leaks, and slow queries.
refactor-reviewer
Refactoring review expert. Evaluates refactoring risk and verifies behavior preservation.
code-simplifier
Cleanup refactoring expert. Simplifies code, eliminates duplication, preserves behavior.
contract-neutral-reviewer
Contract-neutral fallback reviewer. Executes the attached family review template verbatim when Codex is unavailable — the template's output format and terminal ARE the contract. Independent research, no fed conclusions.
tech-spec-reviewer
Technical spec review expert. Reviews technical documents for completeness, feasibility, and risk assessment, and provides improvement suggestions.