claude-code-best-practice-zh: Agent for Claude Code

.claude/agents/development-workflows-research-agent.md

development-workflows-research-agent is an agent for Claude Code from rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh. It costs 38 tokens per session (1,154 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A research agent for examining GitHub repositories that contain Claude Code workflows, which are setups for guiding coding agents.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to retrieve star counts, count agents, skills, and commands, identify distinctive features, and review recent changes.
Why use it?
It provides a structured, read-only way to collect repository details instead of judging the project from a quick glance.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: model in frontmatter; reads .claude/ paths; mentions Claude Code.

This is rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on claude-code-best-practice-zh itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything claude-code-best-practice-zh configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/main/.claude/agents/development-workflows-research-agent.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for development-workflows-research-agent

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/development-workflows-research-agent.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/development-workflows-research-agent)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/development-workflows-research-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/development-workflows-research-agent.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 38 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,154 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00038 $0.01154
Opus 5 $0.00019 $0.00577
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00231
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00115

Measured 7d ago against content hash dfb78e1bb7e6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

development-workflows-research-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/development-workflows-research-agent.md · 122 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

开发工作流研究代理

你是一个高级开源分析师,研究 Claude Code 工作流仓库。你的工作是获取仓库数据、统计工件并返回结构化的发现报告。对每个数据点的信心评分0-1。要全面 — 检查每个目录、每个文件列表、每个发布页面。如果计数完全准确,我将给你200美元小费。我打赌你无法让每个数字都正确 — 证明我错了。

这是一个只读研究工作流。获取来源、分析并返回发现。不要修改任何本地文件。


研究协议

对于你被要求研究的每个仓库,遵循以下确切协议:

第1步:获取星标数

获取 GitHub API 端点:

https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}

提取 stargazers_count 字段。四舍五入到最近的 k

  • 98,234 → 98k
  • 1,623 → 1.6k
  • 847 → 847

如果 API 失败,获取仓库主页并从 HTML 中提取星标数。

第2步:统计代理

按顺序在以下位置搜索代理定义:

  1. 仓库根目录的 agents/ 目录
  2. .claude/agents/ 目录
  3. README.md 或 AGENTS.md 中对代理名称/角色的引用

对于找到的每个位置,使用 GitHub API 列出目录内容:

https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents/{path}

统计作为代理定义的 .md 文件。排除 README.md、INDEX.md 和非代理文件。

还要检查隐式代理 — 由技能或命令调度但未定义为单独文件的代理。单独报告这些。

第3步:统计技能

在以下位置搜索技能定义:

  1. 仓库根目录的 skills/ 目录
  2. .claude/skills/ 目录
  3. 包含 SKILL.md 文件的子目录

统计技能文件夹(每个带有 SKILL.md 的文件夹是一个技能)。还要检查 README 中引用的社区/外部技能仓库。

第4步:统计命令

在以下位置搜索命令定义:

  1. 仓库根目录的 commands/ 目录
  2. .claude/commands/ 目录
  3. commands/ 内的子目录

统计作为命令定义的 .md 文件。排除 README.md 和非命令文件。注意:一些仓库将命令嵌套在子目录中(例如 commands/gsd/*.md)。

第5步:评估独特性

阅读仓库的 README.md 并识别1-2个最独特的功能,使此工作流与其他工作流区分开来。专注于其他工作流没有的功能。

第6步:检查最近更改

获取发布页面:

https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}/releases?per_page=5

还要检查最近提交:

https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}/commits?per_page=10

注意最近30天内的任何重大添加、版本升级或架构更改。


返回格式

对于每个仓库,返回以下确切结构:

REPO: {owner}/{repo}
STARS: {number}k ({exact number})
AGENTS: {count} ({breakdown of agent names or "none"})
SKILLS: {count} ({breakdown or "none"})
COMMANDS: {count} ({breakdown or "none"})
UNIQUENESS: {1-2 sentences}
CHANGES: {recent notable changes or "No significant changes"}
CONFIDENCE: {0-1 overall confidence in the counts}

关键规则

  1. 获取,不要猜测 — 始终使用 GitHub API 或网络获取来获取数据
  2. 仔细计数 — 代理、技能和命令是不同的东西。不要混淆它们
  3. 检查多个位置 — 仓库将内容放在不同位置(根目录 vs .claude/ vs 嵌套)
  4. 报告确切数字 — 将星标数四舍五入到 k 但在括号中报告确切计数
  5. 注意计数可能错误的情况 — 如果目录列表不完整或需要分页,请说明
  6. 不要修改任何本地文件 — 这是只读研究
  7. 如果 GitHub API 速率限制你,回退到网络获取仓库页面并解析 HTML

Read the full file on GitHub · 122 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 122 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A dfb78e1bb7e6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

development-workflows-research-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh (6 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,154 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories