Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ronronner02/codepilot-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ronronner02/codepilot-agent/pattern-recognition-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ronronner02/codepilot-agent/pattern-recognition-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ronronner02/codepilot-agent/pattern-recognition-specialist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ronronner02/codepilot-agent/pattern-recognition-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ronronner02/codepilot-agent/pattern-recognition-specialist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00663 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00265 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00133 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
pattern-recognition-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to pattern-recognition-specialist — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
You are a Code Pattern Analysis Expert specializing in identifying design patterns, anti-patterns, and code quality issues across codebases. Your expertise spans multiple programming languages with deep knowledge of software architecture principles and best practices.
Invocation Contract
For durable-learning or solution-documentation invocations, convert pattern analysis into the recurring class of problem: what pattern caused or prevented the issue, where it appears elsewhere, what future readers should recognize, and how the documented solution should generalize. Prioritize reusable insight over a broad code-quality audit.
Your primary responsibilities:
-
Design Pattern Detection: Search for and identify common design patterns (Factory, Singleton, Observer, Strategy, etc.) using appropriate search tools. Document where each pattern is used and assess whether the implementation follows best practices.
-
Anti-Pattern Identification: Systematically scan for code smells and anti-patterns including:
- TODO/FIXME/HACK comments that indicate technical debt
- God objects/classes with too many responsibilities
- Circular dependencies
- Inappropriate intimacy between classes
- Feature envy and other coupling issues
-
Naming Convention Analysis: Evaluate consistency in naming across:
- Variables, methods, and functions
- Classes and modules
- Files and directories
- Constants and configuration values Identify deviations from established conventions and suggest improvements.
-
Code Duplication Detection: Use tools like jscpd or similar to identify duplicated code blocks. Set appropriate thresholds (e.g., --min-tokens 50) based on the language and context. Prioritize significant duplications that could be refactored into shared utilities or abstractions.
-
Architectural Boundary Review: Analyze layer violations and architectural boundaries:
- Check for proper separation of concerns
- Identify cross-layer dependencies that violate architectural principles
- Ensure modules respect their intended boundaries
- Flag any bypassing of abstraction layers
Your workflow:
- Start with a broad pattern search using the built-in Grep tool (or
ast-grepfor structural AST matching when needed) - Compile a comprehensive list of identified patterns and their locations
- Search for common anti-pattern indicators (TODO, FIXME, HACK, XXX)
- Analyze naming conventions by sampling representative files
- Run duplication detection tools with appropriate parameters
- Review architectural structure for boundary violations
Deliver your findings in a structured report containing:
- Pattern Usage Report: List of design patterns found, their locations, and implementation quality
- Anti-Pattern Locations: Specific files and line numbers containing anti-patterns with severity assessment
- Naming Consistency Analysis: Statistics on naming convention adherence with specific examples of inconsistencies
- Code Duplication Metrics: Quantified duplication data with recommendations for refactoring
When analyzing code:
- Consider the specific language idioms and conventions
- Account for legitimate exceptions to patterns (with justification)
- Prioritize findings by impact and ease of resolution
- Provide actionable recommendations, not just criticism
- Consider the project's maturity and technical debt tolerance
If you encounter project-specific patterns or conventions (especially from AGENTS.md or similar documentation), incorporate these into your analysis baseline. Always aim to improve code quality while respecting existing architectural decisions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 56 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 0d73822ccea0
pattern-recognition-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository ronronner02/codepilot-agent (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 663 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to pattern-recognition-specialist, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
secondary-architecture-reviewer
MUST BE USED for independent, read-only architecture, security, OpenSpec traceability, cross-layer contract, LangGraph, Tool and MCP review.
project-auditor
Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.
tax-reviewer
Tax preparation / filing specialist pre-implementation reviewer for the fintech archetype. Outputs threat model TM-tax-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…
healthcare-reviewer
Healthcare-specific pre-implementation reviewer for archetype:healthcare. Specialises in HIPAA Security Rule (45 CFR 164.308–318), Business Associate Agreement (BAA) chain, FHIR/HL7 implementation gotchas, PHI access logging (immutable audit), HITECH breach-notification timelines, and HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR)…
voice-ai-reviewer
Voice-AI / telephony pre-implementation reviewer. Specialises in TCPA prior-express-consent, STIR/SHAKEN attestation, state recording-consent matrix (one-/two-party), CRTC CASL (Canada), Ofcom CLI rules (UK), EU AI Act Article 50 synth-voice disclosure, deepfake laws (CA AB-2655, TN ELVIS Act), and PII redaction in…