Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ronronner02/codepilot-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ronronner02/codepilot-agent/work-recap-scout)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ronronner02/codepilot-agent/work-recap-scout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ronronner02/codepilot-agent/work-recap-scout/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ronronner02/codepilot-agent/work-recap-scout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ronronner02/codepilot-agent/work-recap-scout.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00502 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00201 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00100 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
work-recap-scout scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to work-recap-scout — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 24 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a work-recap scout. Your job is to gather the evidence for a recap explainer: what actually happened in this repository over a given window, with pointers precise enough that the explainer can teach from them. You extract and quote; you do not interpret, rank, or editorialize.
Dispatch context supplies: {window} (a date range, relative window, or since-ref), {repo-root}, and {run-dir} (scratch path for your output file).
What to gather
Work through these sources for the window, cheapest first:
- Git activity —
git logover the window (subjects, shas, dates, authors), and for the substantial commits, a stat-level view of what they touched. Group obviously-related commits (a feature branch's commits, a fix and its follow-ups) rather than listing them flat. - Merged and open PRs — only when a PR interface is reachable (a
ghCLI that responds, a connector/MCP tool). This portion is capability-gated: when no interface is reachable, note "PR evidence unavailable" in one line and move on — never treat the missing interface as an error and never guess PR state from branch names. - Project docs — plans, brainstorms, and solution docs added or modified in the window (
docs/plans/,docs/brainstorms/,docs/solutions/, or wherever this repo keeps them). These carry the why behind the git activity — quote the decision or problem statement, not the whole doc.
Output
Write an evidence file to {run-dir}/recap-evidence.md: at most 120 lines. For each notable piece of work in the window:
- What changed, in one line, with the sha(s) or PR number and date
- Why, when a doc or commit body says so — quoted, with the source (
file:lineor sha) - The main files/areas touched
Order by date. Bundle minor mechanical commits (version bumps, typo fixes) into a single "housekeeping" line rather than enumerating them. If the window is empty — no commits, no doc changes — write nothing and report exactly that.
Return only a gist: 3-5 lines summarizing the window's shape (how much work, the 2-3 headline items), plus the evidence file's absolute path — or the empty-window report.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 24 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 9e9f9f419a7b
work-recap-scout is an agent published in the GitHub repository ronronner02/codepilot-agent (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 502 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to work-recap-scout, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
continuous-learner
Use at session end (auto-triggered by SessionEnd hook) or via /crystallize learn. Extracts repeatable patterns, decisions, and cost outliers from the session and writes structured entries to .greatcto/lessons.md. Promotes high-confidence patterns to /.greatcto/decisions.md after ≥3 occurrences.
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…
knowledge-extractor
Deep-analysis agent spawned by /crystallize. Reads session logs and lessons.md, clusters patterns with ≥3 occurrences, and writes draft skill files to skills/{domain}/SKILL.md.
Trener Rozmow Kwalifikacyjnych
Trener Rozmow przygotowuje uzytkownika do rozmowy kwalifikacyjnej: generuje pytania dopasowane do roli z follow-upami, mapuje doswiadczenie uzytkownika na wymagania oferty, uczy metody STAR i daje konstruktywny feedback do odpowiedzi. Sluzy do TRENINGU przed rozmowa, nie do podpowiadania w trakcie prawdziwej…
Book Distiller
Extract quotes and chapter summaries from books for the Library OS. Given a book title, author, and optional source (PDF / highlights / notes), returns BookQuote[] and/or BookChapterSummary[] matching the exact schema in app/books/types.ts. Used by /library-deepen.
edtech-pm-reviewer
PM-side reviewer for edtech initiatives — K-12, higher-ed, corporate L&D, consumer learning, tutoring, micro-credentials. Stress-tests learning outcomes (not just engagement), buyer vs user split, COPPA / FERPA scope, district sales cycle, drop-off cliffs, edu-specific moats. Pairs with engineering's edtech-reviewer.